You make a lot of assumptions. You said I was from Reddit too (not true). You said I was a golem blah blah blah.
You literally know nothing about me, but constantly make assumptions and insult me over and over again. Why? Are you insecure? Are you sad, frustrated, angry, miserable? I’m guessing it’s all of the above.
You originally said to ask a question and I asked a basic question. You gave a good answer and I agreed with you, that you believe the original Q posts because other people believe them. Now you’re angry again. I don’t understand why you’re so upset.
I’m not judging, but did you go to college? This type of thinking is not that deep, it’s literally the basics of an early college education.
Maybe this type of information blows your mind, but it just reminds me of when everyone was watching Fight Club in college and acting all edgy. In case you haven’t seen it, the movie glorifies this Q outlook and nihilism in general.
Add multiple layers of 'coincidences' which mathematically proves legitimacy (standard deviation)
Not true, actually, coincidences do not prove legitimacy. Proving an evidence-based hypothesis more than once proves legitimacy.
Where did I say I went through all the Q posts?
You make a lot of assumptions. You said I was from Reddit too (not true). You said I was a golem blah blah blah.
You literally know nothing about me, but constantly make assumptions and insult me over and over again. Why? Are you insecure? Are you sad, frustrated, angry, miserable? I’m guessing it’s all of the above.
You originally said to ask a question and I asked a basic question. You gave a good answer and I agreed with you, that you believe the original Q posts because other people believe them. Now you’re angry again. I don’t understand why you’re so upset.
I’m not judging, but did you go to college? This type of thinking is not that deep, it’s literally the basics of an early college education.
Maybe this type of information blows your mind, but it just reminds me of when everyone was watching Fight Club in college and acting all edgy. In case you haven’t seen it, the movie glorifies this Q outlook and nihilism in general.
Not true, actually, coincidences do not prove legitimacy. Proving an evidence-based hypothesis more than once proves legitimacy.
We just went over this, I never stated I went through every Q post or what that was.
Just explain your point, and then we can discuss.
Although, to be fair, you already answered my question earlier, so I’m not sure why you’re asking.
What? What is childish demeaning filth? I was just curious about your education because Q posts just sound like college talking points.