Has anyone noticed these workers putting ballots in different bins after getting the black light treatment, as if they discovered a ballot that's different than others?
Anything is possible. There has been no mention of watermarks from the info which has been released, which leads me to think they are looking for differences in inks.
I was under the impression that this would also involve digging into forensic computer data, but after reading through the document, it appears to only be an audit of paper ballots.
Talk about some lack of transparency ey? Maybe the auditors should’ve gave those requesting details some pizza boxes to entertain themselves with instead ???
Maricopa County denied that its ballots had any watermarks on its Twitter a few days ago. So either there are no watermarks, or the white hats kept the watermarks secret. If it’s the second one, it makes sense why they would keep it from the public.
The UV light will expose differences in inks when compared to an authenticated ballot.:
Paper Examiner 3 -Tactile & Light Examination
a. Examine the physical ballot.
b. Note any differences or observations about the thickness or feel of the ballot and if necessary, attach thickness designator.
c. If Election Day Poll vote, note the presence of a visible fold.
d. If non-Election Day Poll vote, note the absence of visible fold.
e. Confirm Fold Designator on file name is correct (Designators)
f. Note any visible differences in the colors or text on the ballot.
g. Place Ballot under UV-B and UV-A source and compare to representative specimens.
The UV light will expose differences in inks when compared to an authnticted ballot.
Has anyone noticed these workers putting ballots in different bins after getting the black light treatment, as if they discovered a ballot that's different than others?
You could probably guesstimate the number of invalid mail-in ballots just by watching the count for 5-10 minutes.
Precisely. Assuming the ballots are randomly sampled, watching about a hundred of them will give you a pretty good idea of how many may be defective.
How do you tell if they're defective. Do they put those in a different box?
To me being a retarded fag it could mean watermark... But like i said...
Anything is possible. There has been no mention of watermarks from the info which has been released, which leads me to think they are looking for differences in inks.
https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/mail-in-voting-election-integrity-safeguards_508.pdf here's the safeguards.
That, and pressure where a human would’ve circled in a marking or a printer/press
I was under the impression that this would also involve digging into forensic computer data, but after reading through the document, it appears to only be an audit of paper ballots.
it is a first of it's kind full forensic audit - machines and software too!
Talk about some lack of transparency ey? Maybe the auditors should’ve gave those requesting details some pizza boxes to entertain themselves with instead ???
Oh the ol pizza store days. Box folding races were awesome.
That is impressive to watch?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ez_ujJ9VgAUzRII?format=jpg&name=small
Lets hope the Ninjas are aware of the recent Planned Carnival by BLM / ANTIFA in the same Plaza as the Audit. Starting tomorrow!
https://odysee.com/@SaltyCracker:a/shenanaz2:e?r=59YDjMARYk3cNZ43zCSqNRme6iPMw2c3
Maricopa County denied that its ballots had any watermarks on its Twitter a few days ago. So either there are no watermarks, or the white hats kept the watermarks secret. If it’s the second one, it makes sense why they would keep it from the public.
https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/mail-in-voting-election-integrity-safeguards_508.pdf Here you go. Here's the safeguards.