What is surprising to me is that they relied solely on the electronics for the stabilization system. I don't know anything about stabilization systems, but one would think that on something like a carrier, there would be a backup system of some sort in case the main electronic system went down. After all, it's not like electronic systems never go down. Think how much trouble normal people have with computers in everyday business.
The ruskies always knew that. Pretty much all their military hardware, from vehicles to blast doors is run mainly by hydraulics or has them as backup, as a counter for U.S's nukes or hacker attacks in the current days.
I know that the carrier is an old out of date Russian carrier. They bought it with a lie saying they were going to use it as a casino. china loves to lie. Lie lie lie lie lie. They are lying liers that lie. They get the comeuppance they deserve. For any 50 cent army readers. FU!!!!
What is surprising to me is that they relied solely on the electronics for the stabilization system. I don't know anything about stabilization systems, but one would think that on something like a carrier, there would be a backup system of some sort in case the main electronic system went down. After all, it's not like electronic systems never go down. Think how much trouble normal people have with computers in everyday business.
The ruskies always knew that. Pretty much all their military hardware, from vehicles to blast doors is run mainly by hydraulics or has them as backup, as a counter for U.S's nukes or hacker attacks in the current days.
The Russians triplicate every system as the systems they have break down so often, very poor design and workmanship.
I know that the carrier is an old out of date Russian carrier. They bought it with a lie saying they were going to use it as a casino. china loves to lie. Lie lie lie lie lie. They are lying liers that lie. They get the comeuppance they deserve. For any 50 cent army readers. FU!!!!
Think Ever Given.