I just did a little search on "anecdotal evidence" and was surprised to read the first page entries were all negative, warning against making decisions based upon it. Now I don't offer only anecdotal evidence in discussions because of course it is not always helpful. Sometimes when I hear that the best facts have already been shared and I think individual personal experience has not been represented, I do share it. That is only common sense. But I almost sense the search was geared to dismiss one from considering...adverse reaction testimonies? But in the absence of proper TESTING these personal reports are still part of the "testing" and should not be dismissed as merely "anecdotal evidence".
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
TY for that comfort. I have daughters, and I've warned them not to hug anyone at work or church. Is it true the shedding weakens each day after the shot?
The doctors I've listened to say that normal viruses shed and that they only do so for several days. However, doctors are also concerned about the injections that contain a spike protein, and no one is sure what those things do in terms of being transmitted to people and the timing of how long that may go on.
No one knows for sure yet, but overall, my research indicates the longer time from the vax the less likely that others near will be affected. That's why they say to wear a mask for 2 weeks, as though it does anything. But at the same time, we just don't know.