I just did a little search on "anecdotal evidence" and was surprised to read the first page entries were all negative, warning against making decisions based upon it. Now I don't offer only anecdotal evidence in discussions because of course it is not always helpful. Sometimes when I hear that the best facts have already been shared and I think individual personal experience has not been represented, I do share it. That is only common sense. But I almost sense the search was geared to dismiss one from considering...adverse reaction testimonies? But in the absence of proper TESTING these personal reports are still part of the "testing" and should not be dismissed as merely "anecdotal evidence".
Comments (9)
sorted by:
The same people saying that adverse reactions to Covid "vaccines" are just anecdotal evidence... also say that there was no evidence of election fraud in 2020.
Somehow... I don't think I value their opinion.
Anecdotal evidence is very useful in science. It is exactly anecdotal evidence that drives every single investigation in science. No one in science ignores anecdotal evidence. They take it, and create an experiment to test whether or not the anecdotal evidence is supported by the experiment, and if so, by how much (statistical analysis).
Even when if the experiment shows "statistical significance" that still doesn't prove anything, but some people (mostly non-scientists, but some scientists as well) believe it does. This is a failing of the way we process information and create actionable beliefs, not a failing of science itself.
The main point is, anecdotal evidence is essential, statistical evidence (the result of every experiment) is essential, both are admissible, neither is "proof" of truth.
Covid Vaccine sheds. It will fuck up women's menstrual cycles. How do I know? Just yesterday, they started trying to cover it up:
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/29/technology/covid-vaccine-period-conspiracy.html
A "vaccine" shouldn't affect a woman's menstruation. Yet this one does. What else affects menstruation? https://wildlife.utah.gov/pdf/mule_deer/mdwg-14_fertility_control.pdf
The harmful effects are reversible - the treatment has yet to be released to the public. White hats are in control - they always have been - and there is nothing to fear except fear itself. God wins, every time.
TY for that comfort. I have daughters, and I've warned them not to hug anyone at work or church. Is it true the shedding weakens each day after the shot?
The doctors I've listened to say that normal viruses shed and that they only do so for several days. However, doctors are also concerned about the injections that contain a spike protein, and no one is sure what those things do in terms of being transmitted to people and the timing of how long that may go on.
No one knows for sure yet, but overall, my research indicates the longer time from the vax the less likely that others near will be affected. That's why they say to wear a mask for 2 weeks, as though it does anything. But at the same time, we just don't know.
If it doesn't happen in a controlled setting, like a "trial," it's considered anecdotal.
If someone dies within minutes of the jab, they say it's just a coincidence, but no link.
Anecdotal evidence is where serious inquiry should start, so save them, collate them, try to corroborate them, and keep pushing.