I just did a little search on "anecdotal evidence" and was surprised to read the first page entries were all negative, warning against making decisions based upon it. Now I don't offer only anecdotal evidence in discussions because of course it is not always helpful. Sometimes when I hear that the best facts have already been shared and I think individual personal experience has not been represented, I do share it. That is only common sense. But I almost sense the search was geared to dismiss one from considering...adverse reaction testimonies? But in the absence of proper TESTING these personal reports are still part of the "testing" and should not be dismissed as merely "anecdotal evidence".