IMHO, the actual/REAL people among us for whom the term "Sexually Dangerous/Highly likely to reoffend/escalate" almost never seem to get jammed like this. For one thing, if they're "still dangerous" that means that the "rehabilitation" is and always was a not so polite fiction irrespective of the offense. And those who are actually guilty/dangerous in that sense and proven it by their actions should NEVER be part of a discussion regarding what to do with them/about them in The Community...because they should never actually get out.
But that would endanger both the industry they've created (caseworkers, information filing and retrieval for CORI/NICS/Sex Offender Database Tracking Systems), the legislative schemes they've created and funded with your tax dollars AND a continuing justification to put all the rest of us under Investigation Eternal in the exercise of OUR rights...because they put dangerous people among us specifically to justify the infringements on everyone ELSE'S rights (after all, we have to make sure that YOU aren't as tainted as the guy we let out in YOUR neighborhood and probably got a job as a counselor now that he's ALMOST cured).
If anyone ever made the mistake of putting me in charge this wouldn't even be a question.... because if someone was actually convicted of an offense of THIS nature-and I don't mean 17 year old with a 16 year old sexual partner or a drunk taking a leak behind a building and a dumpster, the only question would be Is It Life or Is It Death? Either way the idea of any of them winding up In The Wild again would be a moot point.
IMHO, the actual/REAL people among us for whom the term "Sexually Dangerous/Highly likely to reoffend/escalate" almost never seem to get jammed like this. For one thing, if they're "still dangerous" that means that the "rehabilitation" is and always was a not so polite fiction irrespective of the offense. And those who are actually guilty/dangerous in that sense and proven it by their actions should NEVER be part of a discussion regarding what to do with them/about them in The Community...because they should never actually get out.
But that would endanger both the industry they've created (caseworkers, information filing and retrieval for CORI/NICS/Sex Offender Database Tracking Systems), the legislative schemes they've created and funded with your tax dollars AND a continuing justification to put all the rest of us under Investigation Eternal in the exercise of OUR rights...because they put dangerous people among us specifically to justify the infringements on everyone ELSE'S rights (after all, we have to make sure that YOU aren't as tainted as the guy we let out in YOUR neighborhood and probably got a job as a counselor now that he's ALMOST cured).
If anyone ever made the mistake of putting me in charge this wouldn't even be a question.... because if someone was actually convicted of an offense of THIS nature-and I don't mean 17 year old with a 16 year old sexual partner or a drunk taking a leak behind a building and a dumpster, the only question would be Is It Life or Is It Death? Either way the idea of any of them winding up In The Wild again would be a moot point.