...you can at least tell them what is claimed to be in the three most common vaccines of which I am aware:
"WHAT ARE THE INGREDIENTS IN THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE?
"The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine includes the following ingredients: mRNA, lipids ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 2 [(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3- phosphocholine, and cholesterol), potassium chloride, monobasic potassium phosphate, sodium chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and sucrose" (https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download#page=2).
"WHAT ARE THE INGREDIENTS IN THE MODERNA COVID-19 VACCINE?
"The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine contains the following ingredients: messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), lipids (SM-102, polyethylene glycol [PEG] 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol [DMG], cholesterol, and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC]), tromethamine, tromethamine hydrochloride, acetic acid, sodium acetate trihydrate, and sucrose" (https://www.fda.gov/media/144638/download#page=2).
"WHAT ARE THE INGREDIENTS IN THE JANSSEN COVID-19 VACCINE?
"The Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine includes the following ingredients: recombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, citric acid monohydrate, trisodium citrate dihydrate, ethanol, 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HBCD), polysorbate-80, sodium chloride" (https://www.fda.gov/media/146305/download#page=2).
I found the above quite readily via: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/faq.html
I was inspired to look this up because -- after various claims here and similar places (e. g., https://greatawakening.win/p/12iNZQmAEg/next-time-someone-tells-you-they/) -- I was under the impression that the ingredients were kept totally secret with not even any pretense that they would be shared. I was shocked to so easily find an official source readily presenting the alleged ingredients of every major vaccine.
Folks, we ALL have a responsibility to do better! Please be careful to clearly state what you know and do not know. It makes us all look bad if we seem to be peddling misinformation. We all make mistakes, however, and it is fine to speculate and admit ignorance (partial or total).
That being said, it is my understanding that many believe the ingredients of the vaccines are kept highly secret when in fact they seem to be clearly presented via official CDC and FDA sources. I am personally skeptical that the alleged ingredients list is complete and accurate. But others had me thinking that the ingredients were not available in any sense, and, had I boldly made that assertion to someone on the other side, they might have very well linked me the above and forced me to eat a bit of crow! Notably, it could be by design that people infiltrate and spread misinformation with false confidence in order to malign our purpose and our views. We must be more diligent! We must be more thorough, and we must be more clear about what, exactly, we are trying to convey with our contributions.
So, tell me, please: is my concern on point here or have I misunderstood the claims I have seen about the list of ingredients not being made available?
Thanks and keep up the good work! Just always strive to improve! Unless Jesus is lurking here, none of us is perfect! ;p
Look at the clue word, sweetie. "Includes". They tell you some of the ingredients. They imply that that's not all of them.
Not sure why my previous reply got downvoted, but I found this: https://www.janssen.com/ It looks like Janssen is a pharmaceutical company under Johnson & Johnson who developed their vaccine. No matter the name on the vaccine, I'd probably prefer being injected with COVID given the choice! ?
Apologies! This reply should have gone to the one below. I'm going to leave it up for the content even though I accidentally responded to the wrong post.
Good eye! I had not considered that perspective. It is a curious word choice, perhaps. As I stated, I am skeptical even if they say, "Here is EVERYTHING!" But, as you point out, they almost imply that they may be sharing a sub-category of the ingredients. It's like saying, "This product includes non-alcoholic beer" without mentioning that it also includes ethanol rendered from beer! ?
mRNA....for what though? 'Offline" they say for the 'spike protein', but they don't say entire vs partial, length of the mRNA (nucleotide length), are there any other mRNA's in there (and for what....), or any other details. They also don't give volumes of the 'stuff', whereas other vac's give ingredients in microgram or microliter measurements (or fractions thereof). It's actually a synthetic mRNA that has been modified in some form so it's less immunogenic (they say) and doesn't breakdown as quickly (they say). How did they modify it? What are the effects of the modification? Other questions we might not think of asking since we're not virologists or biologists. It's like saying 'what's in your meatloaf' and the answer is 'mystery meat'.
I recall someone posted on here a few months back about her contacting the state health department and reading off a list of items that were all poisons; formaldehyde being one of them, and fetal tissue, green monkey brain cells, etc. The health dept person was shocked. --She apparently had taken it off the pink book info somewhere in the CDC website. Anyone recall?
I remember that post! Horrible, unfathomable things being injected into one’s body as I recall. Wish I had bookmarked it.
Well to be really honest, even if written on honour by their CEOs i wouldn't trust that list, we heard of much shit in, also fetal tissue, something from the pork (i think something with sugar, the same they use to make candies), genes therapy, fertily stuffs, and so fort, no one can confirm or not those claims nor what's written on that paper.... but knowing who we have against, i'd rather bet on what's being said and not written, much simpler way, and when debating (also about covid) and people tell's me science or this or that, i kindly answer them that i did trust science too actually, until i realized what big pharma are and how the wheel turns, so at the end of the day, you talking about covid, or vaxes, or whatever, the question is always DID YOU ACTUALLY SEE IT WITH YOUR OWN EYES? ex
There are tests in place yo bla bla - Ok hold on, once the pick up your stuffs from nose or whatever, do you ship yourself with it and actually see how it is analysed and the response produced? Are you sure there's actually someone behind checking those and not a lottery system or random one where each test has a % of being positive in any case?
Reverse but same logic for the vax, as exist but there's nothing that can proof me his ' good effect '
I've always been for the idea that nature takes care of everything, thousand years ago people was well alive and there was nothing of this, how? Ah yeah, healthy and clean air, food, and specially, NO BIG PHARMA around i may be wrong of course, but i definitely prefer to take my chances with the so called COVID (aka seasonal flu boosted with shit from other viruses) and let nature do his job, rather than taking that hellish jab
Good points! And I think this highlights the fact that these attacks we are under cause a breakdown in trust. We don't know what to believe and we cannot all be experts. Even those who are have limited access to what they'd need to draw strong conclusions. We're in a real mess! All the more reason to speak carefully and clearly.
Thanks for your thoughtful comment!
I think most people know and are aware of what is them and that’s where the problem lies.
If aborted fetal tissues etc are not in the lists then the lists are incomplete.
Johnson and Johnson, not Jansen!!! You do all this work and get THAT wrong???
Hello, friend! I actually noticed that, but, if you'll consult the official documents, the Johnson and Johnson IS officially referred to as the Janssen vaccine ? I didn't bother to dig into the why as I am quite busy, but I would certainly appreciate it if you would like to take lead on getting to the bottom of whatever that is about. Thanks in advance should you decide to do so.