Even if it’s not trending, is it possible people are anticipating an incident, and therefore searching it up each day so as to be sure not to miss an article on said incident? One of the things on that article you posted said it might be a popular search, even if it’s not trending. Just a thought. Either way it’s super weird.
I upvoted both you guys not because I agree with you but solely on the basis that you were downvoted after shedding more light on the possibility of why that search term is there, which is ridiculous and screams of insecurity.
EDIT: I’ll add, the reason I don’t agree, despite the added perspective of how auto-complete is done, is because I don’t see any reason for the word incident to be a popular search, let alone a search at all, when there has been no incident. I mean there’s apparently a casino with the same name but it has less searches that crazy times carnival incident? Extremely doubtful.
And I'm completely open to being wrong, just felt like presenting why I think it's perfectly reasonable for that search to show up in auto-complete. And the only way to find the truth and most reasonable explanation is to hear both sides of the argument and people can then form their opinions based on all the information and possibilities available.
Some users see the downvote button as purely a disagreement button. They probably just don't believe you. I wouldn't take it personal if I can help it. Not saying that's always my first reaction to downvotes though. ?
This needs a sticky also in Patriots win
Sticky that open carry is 100% run of the mill acceptable and very very common in AZ
All this proves is that Google needs more information for trends than they do for auto-complete.
Even if it’s not trending, is it possible people are anticipating an incident, and therefore searching it up each day so as to be sure not to miss an article on said incident? One of the things on that article you posted said it might be a popular search, even if it’s not trending. Just a thought. Either way it’s super weird.
Anyone looking for a GOOD laugh: https://youtu.be/EShUeudtaFg
Probably the best video on the internet.
Damn, downvoted for the truth.
I upvoted both you guys not because I agree with you but solely on the basis that you were downvoted after shedding more light on the possibility of why that search term is there, which is ridiculous and screams of insecurity.
EDIT: I’ll add, the reason I don’t agree, despite the added perspective of how auto-complete is done, is because I don’t see any reason for the word incident to be a popular search, let alone a search at all, when there has been no incident. I mean there’s apparently a casino with the same name but it has less searches that crazy times carnival incident? Extremely doubtful.
Thanks, fren.
And I'm completely open to being wrong, just felt like presenting why I think it's perfectly reasonable for that search to show up in auto-complete. And the only way to find the truth and most reasonable explanation is to hear both sides of the argument and people can then form their opinions based on all the information and possibilities available.
Some users see the downvote button as purely a disagreement button. They probably just don't believe you. I wouldn't take it personal if I can help it. Not saying that's always my first reaction to downvotes though. ?
My "is we gonna" gave me "die tomorrow ", "party" "what is we gonna see" "is after we collided gonna be on netflix" (lol)
It all depends on your personal search history