I upvoted both you guys not because I agree with you but solely on the basis that you were downvoted after shedding more light on the possibility of why that search term is there, which is ridiculous and screams of insecurity.
EDIT: I’ll add, the reason I don’t agree, despite the added perspective of how auto-complete is done, is because I don’t see any reason for the word incident to be a popular search, let alone a search at all, when there has been no incident. I mean there’s apparently a casino with the same name but it has less searches that crazy times carnival incident? Extremely doubtful.
And I'm completely open to being wrong, just felt like presenting why I think it's perfectly reasonable for that search to show up in auto-complete. And the only way to find the truth and most reasonable explanation is to hear both sides of the argument and people can then form their opinions based on all the information and possibilities available.
Some users see the downvote button as purely a disagreement button. They probably just don't believe you. I wouldn't take it personal if I can help it. Not saying that's always my first reaction to downvotes though. ?
Damn, downvoted for the truth.
I upvoted both you guys not because I agree with you but solely on the basis that you were downvoted after shedding more light on the possibility of why that search term is there, which is ridiculous and screams of insecurity.
EDIT: I’ll add, the reason I don’t agree, despite the added perspective of how auto-complete is done, is because I don’t see any reason for the word incident to be a popular search, let alone a search at all, when there has been no incident. I mean there’s apparently a casino with the same name but it has less searches that crazy times carnival incident? Extremely doubtful.
Thanks, fren.
And I'm completely open to being wrong, just felt like presenting why I think it's perfectly reasonable for that search to show up in auto-complete. And the only way to find the truth and most reasonable explanation is to hear both sides of the argument and people can then form their opinions based on all the information and possibilities available.
Yes, exactly. Thanks for your insight. Discussion is good!
I updooted ya. People can be haphazard readers (scanners) and don’t think sometimes before downdooting.
Some users see the downvote button as purely a disagreement button. They probably just don't believe you. I wouldn't take it personal if I can help it. Not saying that's always my first reaction to downvotes though. ?