It could be, it depends on how it's implemented behind the scenes to be honest.
The autocomplete feature on most search engines is usually implemented as a digital trie of some sort, probably a burst trie because people are typing one letter at a time: https://neuraldump.wordpress.com/tag/burst-trie/
Each of the 'leafs' of the tree has a speculative predictive algorithm that based on the web crawl. These days it's usually a semi-supervisted machine learning algo.
Trends is mostly based on what people actually search for. They need to press return. Different data structure. It's a trend of what people receive a ranked list of result for, not a what people are typing. Usually you can tell such things by taking letters from completely unrelated unicode tables.
source: this is how a basic information retrieval system is taught in computer science and based on my own interpretation based on my experience in search engine optimization over the last few decades. I could be totally off the mark.
It could be, it depends on how it's implemented behind the scenes to be honest.
The autocomplete feature on most search engines is usually implemented as a digital trie of some sort, probably a burst trie because people are typing one letter at a time: https://neuraldump.wordpress.com/tag/burst-trie/
Each of the 'leafs' of the tree has a speculative predictive algorithm that based on the web crawl. These days it's usually a semi-supervisted machine learning algo.
Trends is mostly based on what people actually search for. They need to press return. Different data structure. It's a trend of what people receive a ranked list of result for, not a what people are typing. Usually you can tell such things by taking letters from completely unrelated unicode tables.
source: this is how a basic information retrieval system is taught in computer science and based on my own interpretation based on my experience in search engine optimization over the last few decades. I could be totally off the mark.