I am not interested in a persons opinion of me.....I am interested in my rights, which are not hostile.... it's called the truth, self-evident and you and I have have been endowed by our creator with certain unalienable Rights.....not sure where you see the hostility, except for the fact that some establishments think they can infringe on my right to safety and happiness. That is hostile! I would not cause a scene, I don't wear a mask anywhere, but if someone is going try to stop me from entering because I don't wear a mask that is when I smile and hand them this to read.
Agree in general, BUTT (see that's a big but)....If a SPECIFIC baker has to make WHATEVER cake YOU choose, the horse has already left the barn. And I anticipate getting anywhere in this court system will be challenging, but may be a good time to start judge/court shopping. If a podunk judge in HI can stop an EO, then the reciprocal should work. In fact, the judge could even order masks to be related to terrorism, and therefor, stricken.
Don't know, but lots of folks are clearly volunteering where they stand on freedom and who should be in control of ME!
The baker won, but it went way up in the court system. Fortunately, he was able to continue to press, so I guess that is the angle I am bringing out. A lower court COULD rule in favor of freedom, and if the enemy stopped there, it would be done, at least for that district.
Another facet of this, if there is a religious reason to cover one's face, could it be argued there is a religious reason to NOT cover one's face, sighting the baker's ordeal, that an individual has religious freedom/freedom of conscience. Are states issuing ID's with faces covered by faith based garments? I have never seen one, just heard they were.
I am not interested in a persons opinion of me.....I am interested in my rights, which are not hostile.... it's called the truth, self-evident and you and I have have been endowed by our creator with certain unalienable Rights.....not sure where you see the hostility, except for the fact that some establishments think they can infringe on my right to safety and happiness. That is hostile! I would not cause a scene, I don't wear a mask anywhere, but if someone is going try to stop me from entering because I don't wear a mask that is when I smile and hand them this to read.
You have no right to use the business though. So if they want to refuse service bc you’re not wearing a mask they can.
Agree in general, BUTT (see that's a big but)....If a SPECIFIC baker has to make WHATEVER cake YOU choose, the horse has already left the barn. And I anticipate getting anywhere in this court system will be challenging, but may be a good time to start judge/court shopping. If a podunk judge in HI can stop an EO, then the reciprocal should work. In fact, the judge could even order masks to be related to terrorism, and therefor, stricken.
Don't know, but lots of folks are clearly volunteering where they stand on freedom and who should be in control of ME!
The baker won the case, though, so how does that logically compute?
The baker won, but it went way up in the court system. Fortunately, he was able to continue to press, so I guess that is the angle I am bringing out. A lower court COULD rule in favor of freedom, and if the enemy stopped there, it would be done, at least for that district.
Another facet of this, if there is a religious reason to cover one's face, could it be argued there is a religious reason to NOT cover one's face, sighting the baker's ordeal, that an individual has religious freedom/freedom of conscience. Are states issuing ID's with faces covered by faith based garments? I have never seen one, just heard they were.
Some businesses here still have signs that say "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone". It is still legal
And some businesses around the country are refusing service to people wearing masks, that is also their right.