I spoke with a pretty serious biochemist, and asked him about adrenochrome. He immediately confirmed that it's a real thing, but then went on to say that the synthetic substance is many times better than the "natural" substance. I asked him if he means that people are ingesting adrenochrome, but that there is no reason to harvest it from children and he confirmed.
He proceeded to describe the rather simple process by which he can create adrenochrome at will, but he makes better money in stem cells.
Please share your thoughts - if synthetic is cheaper and lower risk, why would they harvest natural?
Why is the synthetic not marketed and promoted for anti aging purposes?
OK - that is the answer. Thank you.
No I was honestly asking lol
I mean - that is the right question. If my acquaintance was correct and adrenochrome works and the synthetic stuff is as good as the natural, then what you are asking is the big question. That would be advertised like crazy. So, this essentially demonstrates the fallacy in my acquaintance's argument.
he would have to try both to know the answer to which is best.