Is it me or is he sounding more and more like q daily? Anyone read his stuff today?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Fair point, circumstantial evidence is more accurate.
The "evidence" is flimsy at best.
If Ron is supposedly Q, how the hell does that explain the proofs? The deltas? Hell how he was able to post right at the same time Trump was?
I don't think ron is Q but helps him. Anyone with the database access can just set the timestamps to make it as exact as you want.
Just watch the HBO doc, it's too much to explain. The board here is biased against it, but I thought the journalist did a good job in exploring the PEOPLE involved, not just regurgitated information you see in other videos.
The journalist conviently forgot about the evidence leading back to Trump, since that wasn’t the desired outcome. I was surprised he even mentioned it though, probably redpilled some people along the way.
I haven't seen this evidence. Is this coming from the HBO doc?
Yes
I watched 1.5 episodes of that.....and what a sack of shit it was. Couldn't continue
I found the last few episodes to be the most enlightening, but to each their own.