Well, umm, yes they lied to you.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
This is not comparable. At all. Not saying the Pentagon thing wasn't fishy, but this is just silly.
This photo was from the 2005 Teterboro incident.
This was a smaller plane, a Canadair 600, which was poorly loaded and hit V1 but failed to rotate, causing it to - at land speed - crash into a building across from the runway.
It's not remotely comparable to the Pentagon, if indeed that is what the OP is getting at.
You can hit a telephone pole with a car at 25mph and still make sense of what happened. Hit it at 125mph and you’ll have a lot of splinters and unanswered questions.
Well yeah, I mean this plane was much, much, much smaller, had a smaller fuel load, was going at a much, much slower (land) speed and... it's just not comparable.
You can't compare an apple to an orange and say it proves that lemon's can't exist. There's zero metrics here.
^this