Just an FYI - this is a heavily shilled topic. They come out of the woodwork for it pretty much every time we have a massive increase in what are likely to be indictments. But they just can't make it go away!
Pppffsh....yep. They've got a lot of seasoned accounts now too. Accounts that exist to basically say (in large numbers of words) "Nuh uh" and "debunked". It's like the Argument Clinic except it is just simple contradiction to get people to stop looking at (whatever subject).
There's useful discussions that go back and forth with the goal of establishing the truth.... and then there's what shills do. Nonstop combative and often ignorant (from a Q perspective) questions, and there's also simple nonstop contradictions.
These get used a lot on this board to get people who aren't well versed in Q posts and who don't understand the topic at hand to just wander away thinking "Oh, that's been debunked?". I've watched some crucial topics die on the vine nearly unseen on this board because shills hit them really hard with just these two things.
Just an FYI - this is a heavily shilled topic. They come out of the woodwork for it pretty much every time we have a massive increase in what are likely to be indictments. But they just can't make it go away!
Good on you for being accurate and listing them as cases anyway since their exact contents are unknown.
Yes, the unknown part makes me smile. NO ONE knows ;-)
I do love surprises.
Watch out for the handshake shills.
Pppffsh....yep. They've got a lot of seasoned accounts now too. Accounts that exist to basically say (in large numbers of words) "Nuh uh" and "debunked". It's like the Argument Clinic except it is just simple contradiction to get people to stop looking at (whatever subject).
Look, if I argue with you, I must take up a contrary position.
EDIT: Who downvotes Monty Python?LOL gotta lighten up folks
It goes
CLEESE: "Look, if I argue with you, I must take up a contrary position."
PALIN: 'But it isn't just saying 'No it isn't.'"
CLEESE: "Yes it is."
PALIN: "No it isn't!!"
There's useful discussions that go back and forth with the goal of establishing the truth.... and then there's what shills do. Nonstop combative and often ignorant (from a Q perspective) questions, and there's also simple nonstop contradictions.
These get used a lot on this board to get people who aren't well versed in Q posts and who don't understand the topic at hand to just wander away thinking "Oh, that's been debunked?". I've watched some crucial topics die on the vine nearly unseen on this board because shills hit them really hard with just these two things.