There's useful discussions that go back and forth with the goal of establishing the truth.... and then there's what shills do. Nonstop combative and often ignorant (from a Q perspective) questions, and there's also simple nonstop contradictions.
These get used a lot on this board to get people who aren't well versed in Q posts and who don't understand the topic at hand to just wander away thinking "Oh, that's been debunked?". I've watched some crucial topics die on the vine nearly unseen on this board because shills hit them really hard with just these two things.
Look, if I argue with you, I must take up a contrary position.
EDIT: Who downvotes Monty Python?LOL gotta lighten up folks
It goes
CLEESE: "Look, if I argue with you, I must take up a contrary position."
PALIN: 'But it isn't just saying 'No it isn't.'"
CLEESE: "Yes it is."
PALIN: "No it isn't!!"
There's useful discussions that go back and forth with the goal of establishing the truth.... and then there's what shills do. Nonstop combative and often ignorant (from a Q perspective) questions, and there's also simple nonstop contradictions.
These get used a lot on this board to get people who aren't well versed in Q posts and who don't understand the topic at hand to just wander away thinking "Oh, that's been debunked?". I've watched some crucial topics die on the vine nearly unseen on this board because shills hit them really hard with just these two things.