Why on earth would someone think that because I am discerning with information that I am pro vaccine? That's just utterly ridiculous. What did I say that was in ANY WAY pro vaccine?
I spend a great deal of time writing about why people should not get the vaccine. The number of GENUINE reasons to not get it is overwhelming. But this reason has no basis in evidence. Period.
I am doing nothing more than explaining HOW it has no evidential basis. You choosing to ignore that because you want to fear more than you want to consider contrary evidence is you drinking the kool-aid (believing disinformation).
This is great information, Slyver. I don't have your expertise, but my gut says that the shredding hypothesis is weak, and find the idea that the DS could engineer a vaccine for their engineered virus that would not only harm the receiver, but then go on to harm those around him all a bit preposterous,
You've taken the shots, drank the Cool Aide, good luck to you. Go for the proposed third. Let me know how it turns out.
Why on earth would someone think that because I am discerning with information that I am pro vaccine? That's just utterly ridiculous. What did I say that was in ANY WAY pro vaccine?
I spend a great deal of time writing about why people should not get the vaccine. The number of GENUINE reasons to not get it is overwhelming. But this reason has no basis in evidence. Period.
I am doing nothing more than explaining HOW it has no evidential basis. You choosing to ignore that because you want to fear more than you want to consider contrary evidence is you drinking the kool-aid (believing disinformation).
I get it slyver, very sly and twisted.
This is great information, Slyver. I don't have your expertise, but my gut says that the shredding hypothesis is weak, and find the idea that the DS could engineer a vaccine for their engineered virus that would not only harm the receiver, but then go on to harm those around him all a bit preposterous,