I'm confused. I thought that 'shedding' (with respect to covid) is the sloughing of the virus protein through body fluids/exhalation from the person with covid. The Jab gives the body, thru mRNA, a spike protein that will replicate and function as the covid virus in order to stimulate the immune system to create antibodies against the covid protein. And the story is that the existence of antibodies created by this exposure to spike protein will make it so that the immune system, if exposed to actual covid virus in the future, won't overreact and have the cytokine storm which is causing the body to attack itself, particularly in the respiratory system.
(All of this is irrespective of what additional stuff may be in the jab.) What I cannot explain through my readings is how the jab disables the immune system for other viruses, which is what I've heard on here.
If most of that is true, won't that spike protein stop being dangerous after the immune system has developed the antibodies to 'kill' the spike protein? Won't the injected people's body exhalations eventually become harmless to others (with regards to covid) once the spike is decimated in the 'jabbed' bodies?
Please let me know - I read various sources and articles, including most opinions on here, and this (above) is what I have distilled, to date.
In theory, yes, however the problem is that the spike protein itself seems to be responsible for the blood clotting in all sorts of organs in vaccinated people [and also animals according to the ferret studies of original SARS-COV vaccine trials (early 2000's) and some post trial analysis from labs (around 2013],
probably depending on things like diabetes, cholesterol, weight & other things that affect the cardiovascular system which aren't really being taken into account before vaccinations.
Add to the mix that also, its unclear but somewhat likely that spike protein is able to bind to some receptor in woman's womb and in male sperm if it manages to enter those related tissues, Potentially causing many negative effects (heavy menstrual bleeding, no menstruation, miscarriage, STERILITY!?) which some older studies and recent reports are suggesting IS maybe actually happening.
Now that's potentially a BIG problem for those who get vaccinated and IMO that's their problem but now with the shedding aspect, adds danger and possible risk for unvaccinated people who have been reportedly suffering similar kinds of symptoms and injuries. (one poor vaccinated woman lost her 5mnth old baby) presumably because the spike protein is being shed and contracted by those around them through sex, touch, being in close proximity or in the case of the poor baby, passed on through breastmilk.
That's my understanding of the current situation, now there ARE some pretty big questions we don't know the answers to that need answering to assess the real risk this poses.
here are a couple i can think of right now,
How long do vaccinated people continue to produce spike protein internally and therefore remain potential shedders?
weeks, months, years... forever? if the spike protein is still created long after you develop antibodies, wont the antibodies be perpetually attacking the cells producing spike protein effectively giving you an auto immune disease?
Does spike protein contracted by person B have the ability to deliver mRNA to cells?
(i don't think it does but if that's a yes, then we're in trouble)
No immune system makes antibodies to poison; the spike proteins aren't a virus, they're poison.
The spike proteins are like diatomaceous earth to things with exoskeletons- it kills them with PHYSICAL damage, there is no protection.
If this all were about a virus, anyone already immune to covid wouldn't be affected, and the adverse effects wouldn't be so varied. But this poison affects the vascular system, reproductive system, etc. One virus doesn't do all that.
Ok, now I'm going to need more info. I thought the adverse effects were from the 'carrier' substances included with the spike protein. Also, the problem with priming your immune system for virus 'corona' to the exclusion of other viruses/invaders. (There's a tic toc video shown yesterday on another post on GA that shows a pharmacist opening a new box of 'vaccine' and the accompanying paperwork is BLANK with regards to ingredients, warnings, etc. We don't know what's in these jabs.) Outside of buying into "the entire government is out to eradicate the populace," how did 3 vaccines already get the EUA tag if they didn't show some efficacy for dampening the body's harmful immune over-response to a covid trigger?
Lastly, why would govt use a tool to effect an untargeted mass population decrease? Seems like these sick people would do some kind of eugenics-heavy selection process. Although, as it is, they did succeed to 'treat' a huge proportion of our health care and front line resources. Hard to replace those segments of the population without a multi-year time lag.
I'm confused. I thought that 'shedding' (with respect to covid) is the sloughing of the virus protein through body fluids/exhalation from the person with covid. The Jab gives the body, thru mRNA, a spike protein that will replicate and function as the covid virus in order to stimulate the immune system to create antibodies against the covid protein. And the story is that the existence of antibodies created by this exposure to spike protein will make it so that the immune system, if exposed to actual covid virus in the future, won't overreact and have the cytokine storm which is causing the body to attack itself, particularly in the respiratory system.
(All of this is irrespective of what additional stuff may be in the jab.) What I cannot explain through my readings is how the jab disables the immune system for other viruses, which is what I've heard on here.
If most of that is true, won't that spike protein stop being dangerous after the immune system has developed the antibodies to 'kill' the spike protein? Won't the injected people's body exhalations eventually become harmless to others (with regards to covid) once the spike is decimated in the 'jabbed' bodies?
Please let me know - I read various sources and articles, including most opinions on here, and this (above) is what I have distilled, to date.
Well I certainly want that to be true...that after a time, the spikes keep to themselves. So then how about the endless booster shots?
In theory, yes, however the problem is that the spike protein itself seems to be responsible for the blood clotting in all sorts of organs in vaccinated people [and also animals according to the ferret studies of original SARS-COV vaccine trials (early 2000's) and some post trial analysis from labs (around 2013], probably depending on things like diabetes, cholesterol, weight & other things that affect the cardiovascular system which aren't really being taken into account before vaccinations. Add to the mix that also, its unclear but somewhat likely that spike protein is able to bind to some receptor in woman's womb and in male sperm if it manages to enter those related tissues, Potentially causing many negative effects (heavy menstrual bleeding, no menstruation, miscarriage, STERILITY!?) which some older studies and recent reports are suggesting IS maybe actually happening.
Now that's potentially a BIG problem for those who get vaccinated and IMO that's their problem but now with the shedding aspect, adds danger and possible risk for unvaccinated people who have been reportedly suffering similar kinds of symptoms and injuries. (one poor vaccinated woman lost her 5mnth old baby) presumably because the spike protein is being shed and contracted by those around them through sex, touch, being in close proximity or in the case of the poor baby, passed on through breastmilk.
That's my understanding of the current situation, now there ARE some pretty big questions we don't know the answers to that need answering to assess the real risk this poses.
here are a couple i can think of right now,
How long do vaccinated people continue to produce spike protein internally and therefore remain potential shedders? weeks, months, years... forever? if the spike protein is still created long after you develop antibodies, wont the antibodies be perpetually attacking the cells producing spike protein effectively giving you an auto immune disease?
Does spike protein contracted by person B have the ability to deliver mRNA to cells? (i don't think it does but if that's a yes, then we're in trouble)
this shit is so crazy.
No immune system makes antibodies to poison; the spike proteins aren't a virus, they're poison.
The spike proteins are like diatomaceous earth to things with exoskeletons- it kills them with PHYSICAL damage, there is no protection.
If this all were about a virus, anyone already immune to covid wouldn't be affected, and the adverse effects wouldn't be so varied. But this poison affects the vascular system, reproductive system, etc. One virus doesn't do all that.
Ok, now I'm going to need more info. I thought the adverse effects were from the 'carrier' substances included with the spike protein. Also, the problem with priming your immune system for virus 'corona' to the exclusion of other viruses/invaders. (There's a tic toc video shown yesterday on another post on GA that shows a pharmacist opening a new box of 'vaccine' and the accompanying paperwork is BLANK with regards to ingredients, warnings, etc. We don't know what's in these jabs.) Outside of buying into "the entire government is out to eradicate the populace," how did 3 vaccines already get the EUA tag if they didn't show some efficacy for dampening the body's harmful immune over-response to a covid trigger?
Lastly, why would govt use a tool to effect an untargeted mass population decrease? Seems like these sick people would do some kind of eugenics-heavy selection process. Although, as it is, they did succeed to 'treat' a huge proportion of our health care and front line resources. Hard to replace those segments of the population without a multi-year time lag.