The lenses excuse really made me laugh. What portrait photographer takes a wide angle lenses and attempts to achieve this look on purpose? The way a wide angle lenses works it’s effects are constant across the image and would skew the proportions more evenly. Not differentiating between one subject and the other like a photoshop job. I read intention and manipulation all over this image. Unless some new fancy circus mirror lens came out, no lens can achieves this effect. Why would anyone intentionally want to do this to a portrait image? The premise is ridiculous.
Ask Kinds of proportion red flags here that Don’t with To lens math. I agree and think this helps state your point visually: https://greatawakening.win/p/12iNnUjQmJ/
The lenses excuse really made me laugh. What portrait photographer takes a wide angle lenses and attempts to achieve this look on purpose? The way a wide angle lenses works it’s effects are constant across the image and would skew the proportions more evenly. Not differentiating between one subject and the other like a photoshop job. I read intention and manipulation all over this image. Unless some new fancy circus mirror lens came out, no lens can achieves this effect. Why would anyone intentionally want to do this to a portrait image? The premise is ridiculous.
It’s clearly not a wide angle lens; there’s no distortion in perspective on the things in the room, cept the Carters.
Ask Kinds of proportion red flags here that Don’t with To lens math. I agree and think this helps state your point visually: https://greatawakening.win/p/12iNnUjQmJ/