The dummies and the their tyrants in it together, against each other. Side-effects will skyrocket to the level of back injuries, and companies will go broke paying off the moochers.
Well for sure this is an opportunity for Insurance companies, wink, wink... and yes lots of more money to spend for employers, so I don't know till what extent they will continue to enforce vaccines for employment.
Health insurance costs are more contingent on the size of your group: companies that have less than 100 employees are considered small group and basically it is an off the shelf product. Over 100, there is more flexibility because you underwrite the population, options to self insure, etc. Employer can also make the decision to pass along costs. I think the bigger issue would be if you required a jab and there was an adverse reaction, is that now a worker's comp claim?
What would be the first step? Say an employer had already forced an employee to take the jab in Feb? (Health care). Would you start a paper trail of Dr visits? Visit a lawyer? What would you do?
Not worth the gamble. Corporations protect directors from personal liability for decisions made on behalf of the business. The business can just go bankrupt and the ones calling the shots can walk away without much impact on their personal wealth. You on the other hand could end up looking like sloth from the goonies while you wait in line at the bottom of the creditor list.
Important to get this word out! I like scaring the sh*t out of tyrants!
Ha! Great news!
The dummies and the their tyrants in it together, against each other. Side-effects will skyrocket to the level of back injuries, and companies will go broke paying off the moochers.
This is actually really good news. I am curious if an employers group health cost would go up if they required employees to get the shot
Well for sure this is an opportunity for Insurance companies, wink, wink... and yes lots of more money to spend for employers, so I don't know till what extent they will continue to enforce vaccines for employment.
Health insurance costs are more contingent on the size of your group: companies that have less than 100 employees are considered small group and basically it is an off the shelf product. Over 100, there is more flexibility because you underwrite the population, options to self insure, etc. Employer can also make the decision to pass along costs. I think the bigger issue would be if you required a jab and there was an adverse reaction, is that now a worker's comp claim?
Still can't force someone to take an experimental "vaccine" regardless so to me it's a moot point.
No employer in their right mind would mandate a vaccine and be held liable for the side effects, one big lawsuit and the whole company is done.
Ty. I have a family member whose work is trying to pressure them, I'm sending as much info I can to them so the employers wake tf up.
Sending this to my fam now! Thanks OP.
Good news
What would be the first step? Say an employer had already forced an employee to take the jab in Feb? (Health care). Would you start a paper trail of Dr visits? Visit a lawyer? What would you do?
Not worth the gamble. Corporations protect directors from personal liability for decisions made on behalf of the business. The business can just go bankrupt and the ones calling the shots can walk away without much impact on their personal wealth. You on the other hand could end up looking like sloth from the goonies while you wait in line at the bottom of the creditor list.