WATCH: Rand Paul GRILLS Fauci Over China LIE — Our Govt. FUNDED Research That Led To COVID-19!
(en-volve.com)
? DEM PANIC ?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
To be specific for Rand Paul lets look at a couple things he said when the electoral vote was in contest.
Here he is saying the States have the power and it is essential that they retain that power.
He is amplifying that statement of State's rights and giving direction on how to proceed. It just so happens to be exactly the direction we are currently proceeding.
I assert again, this was all part of the plan.
Thought we were talking about legal vs duty? Congress could have sent them back right? Why have them certify the states choices at the federal level at all? Heck, Trump is the President of the red states and Biden the blue if Congress had no power to help conduct a free and fair election for President right?
Which strawman is next? Ruby Freeman and kin caught ILEGALY invalidating an election in GA on video was a deep fake? Congress should have rejected this state on that video alone. Sent their envelope back asking for a full forensic audit. Duty.
To my original point. You can't legally tell someone not to do their sworn duty so you can catch someone else not doing their sworn duty.
Now, you can make deals with criminals in custody.....but then if they are now criminals, are they still elected officials with authority to conduct a certification?
All of your examples seem to be attempts at conflating illegal activity with a vote. Do you realize what it means to cast a vote? Do you realize that a person can vote in any way they choose for any reason whatsoever and that the people who founded this country fought and died for exactly and expressly that right?
You keep bringing up other things for why they voted wrong. I am focusing on the act of casting a vote, because THAT is the act in question. Any other action such as a "sworn duty" is something else entirely. No one is "sworn" to vote in any particular way ever, nor for any reason. Certainly no one is sworn to vote as you think they should.
Since I am talking about the legality of a vote, and I thought you were talking about the legality of a vote, this example right here of something completely unrelated to the topic of conversation would be a perfect example of a strawman argument.
Can you provide one single law that even implies that this is true?
Can you provide even one theoretical example of how this could possibly be true?
I suggest you are conflating one action with another. A vote is a vote and is sacred. OTHER actions can be treasonous, but not a vote itself.