Kari Mullis (PCR Test inventor) on « Dr » Fauci
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (43)
sorted by:
I uploaded the Kary Mullis clip to Bitchute for wider distribution..
https://www.bitchute.com/video/S1rK2qse73E3/
This is Kary Mullis, quite a number of years ago, judging by his age when he died in August, 2019 -- he was much older than he is in this video. Kary Mullis INVENTED the PCR technology that is currently FRAUDULENTLY being used to diagnose all these "cases" of COVID-19. Mullis always said the PCR technology is a RESEARCH TOOL, and should NEVER be used to diagnose any disease in a human.
He worked with and for Dr. Tony Fauci and knew quite well what he was -- and what he was NOT.
How convenient that Kary Mullis died in September of 2019, immediately before COVID-19 and PCR tests for it showed up. I'm pretty sure if he was still with us he'd be SCREAMING.
Share this!
"Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, you know, he doesn't know anything, really, about anything and I'd say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you could take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it's got a virus in there, you'll know it. He doesn't understand electron microscopy and he doesn't understand medicine, he should not be in a position like he's in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don't know anything about what's going on at the bottom. You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They've got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to and they smugly, like Tony Fauci, does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera."
Quite some time back when the MSM was presenting Li'l Tony as an expert, they included in his resume that he was "the author" of over 1500 articles. That blew it for me right there. Figure just a tad. If he has been working for 30 years, that means 50 articles per year which means 1 article per week EVERY week with two weeks off PER year EVERY year for 3 decades. Ain't no way. That means that he's one of these admin hacks that condescends to put his name on other people's work and then takes the credit for it, and I hold that sort in about the same regard as I hold cock roaches, and so far, Li'l Tony has lived up to my estimation of him.
I write and edit for an online platform and I didn't realize how many articles online were bought and paid for only to have someone else's name slapped on it. I bet that's what he did. Another thing I was disillusioned to find was how many "online reviews" were actually bought and paid for. I have never picked up a job that asked for a detailed "review" of a service or product. The guidelines even tell you what to say. Disgusting.
Thanks for the info. I knew about the articles, but I didn't know about the reviews. That means that the reviews have just become a form of PR for the article and its celebrity author. Propaganda to reinforce the propaganda. Lord, what a sad state we have come to!
Yup "author" is such a loose term in scientific research. No way he was a primary author on that many papers like the media plays him out to be. There is also so much garbage scientific research out there. he could literally contribute half a sentence and they would slap half his name on there
Thank you because i wont watch youtube links.
I was a biology major undergrad and masters in physiology and biophysics. I wrote a paper on the invention of PCR and I can 10000000% say this analysis is spot on. I've worked in research labs and PCR can be inaccurate. I remember even just running our data a few extra cycles could result in completely inaccurate data for our experiments and we would start over.
replying so this comment is saved in my history.
Where are his students or colleagues who share his opinion on PCR’s?
They're everywhere, and the basis of Nuremberg II calling it a PCR fake pandemic scam