I'm local and was offered a job at the audit by 2 people I know working it however I didn't take it being was concerned about an old weed charge may not allow me to pass the background check that's required.
I'm telling you that to let you know how close I am.
So I talked to someone closely associated with the audit a few hours ago and I can't stop smiling. They have found BOXES of fraudulent ballots. Not just invalid ballots or ballots that were not properly marked / counted.....
FAKE PAPER BALLOTS.
"How many boxes?" I asked
"More than enough" was the answer I got back.
That's just one category guys. There are MULTIPLE other categories.
I can't go into other details without risking the process and people doing it but I wanted to encourage you guys and give you some lab-tested pure hopium.
Keep praying and keep dropping red-pills.
GOD WINS!
We agree to disagree. The definition of highly addictive that makes most sense IMHO includes physical withdrawal symptoms, inability to halt use at will for an appreciable length of time, and continued use despite serious negative consequences to life, relationships, work, income, etc. That describes a minute fraction of cannabis consumers (though none I've ever met in 40 years of exposure), even according to NIDA.
I agree with your definition. The vast majority of our clients experience what you describe. For the most part, they are adults who started very young and woke up one day realizing that life had passed them by.
Starting young without a medical.need is bad. If a person was going to try it I tell them.if you have no medical need don't bother. And if they are going to wait until they are 25. Establish who you are first and it won't define you.
So true.
In regards to the <25 issue. The Canadian Army was experiencing a significant washout rate for recruits due to schizophrenia. So, they did a study and published findings relating to chronic use <25. Interestingly enough, since Trudeau was selected, he has relaxed prohibitions regarding marijuana use.