As far as I know its just like a flu test. Some people claim to see some weird microscopic organism or whatever but honestly i take a lot of that with a grain of salt because I feel like you can see a lot of crazy stuff on anything at a microscopic level.
Not literally everything is a conspiracy. I think the PCR conspiracy is just that they cranked up the amplification when they test for covid....not that they put some weird shit on the test.
Yes, the PCR is not fit to the purpose -- it is a manufacturing technique. But even the PCR "test" was never meant to be used alone. A positive test without any symptoms is no indication of an infection even if everyone (who is getting money for doing so), calls it a "case." I have seen the documentation for one test that explicitly states this that it is not to be used solely to diagnose CV.
It was never meant to be (and cannot be) a test at all. As you say, it is a manufacturing technique. It replicates a substance faster than previous techniques could, so that the substance can be studied in a lab.
As the inventor, Kari Mullis said, "It is a process whereby you can take a little bit of something and make a whole lot of something." That is all. It allows researchers to more quickly study that something.
It is not a test to determine the health of anyone for any purpose.
But it is fraudulently being used exactly for that. They have done the same thing with HIV, and Mullis called them out on it, saying they were misusing the process.
Has been vids circulating of little black strands in the masks + test swabs, but I have no idea what they would be- a government (I forget which) did indicate it might be graphene, though I've not seen confirmation.
I avoid, but then the government told me it would be fine, so I ran.
The consequences are that you have a better than 80% chance of "testing positive", inconveniencing yourself and adding to the number of "cases". It's not a test; it's a procedure that was designed to look for viral fragments. If you recently had a cold, a flu jab or fucked a goat, you'll have viral fragments.
You'll have to search this out, but I have read reports of the CDC's "tests" being contaminated. I don't recall with what, or if it was harmful, or just screwed up the results (which are bogus to begin with.
And more seriously, the nasal swab piercing the brain-body barrier and causing leakage.
As far as I know its just like a flu test. Some people claim to see some weird microscopic organism or whatever but honestly i take a lot of that with a grain of salt because I feel like you can see a lot of crazy stuff on anything at a microscopic level.
Not literally everything is a conspiracy. I think the PCR conspiracy is just that they cranked up the amplification when they test for covid....not that they put some weird shit on the test.
Yeah. You will get a fake result, no matter what that result is.
Demand to know the number of cycles.
Tell them to justify that number.
At least, they will know you know they are giving you a fake result.
This is why the number of "cases" suddenly went down in Florida, when Desantis ordered all tests to include the number of cycles.
High cycles = everybody "diagnosed" positive.
Low cycles = everybody "diagnosed" negative.
The scam is playing with the number of cycles.
The PCR is not a diagnostic tool, so using it as one means the results are all fake.
Yes, the PCR is not fit to the purpose -- it is a manufacturing technique. But even the PCR "test" was never meant to be used alone. A positive test without any symptoms is no indication of an infection even if everyone (who is getting money for doing so), calls it a "case." I have seen the documentation for one test that explicitly states this that it is not to be used solely to diagnose CV.
It was never meant to be (and cannot be) a test at all. As you say, it is a manufacturing technique. It replicates a substance faster than previous techniques could, so that the substance can be studied in a lab.
As the inventor, Kari Mullis said, "It is a process whereby you can take a little bit of something and make a whole lot of something." That is all. It allows researchers to more quickly study that something.
It is not a test to determine the health of anyone for any purpose.
But it is fraudulently being used exactly for that. They have done the same thing with HIV, and Mullis called them out on it, saying they were misusing the process.
And who was the exploiter for HIV? Dr. Magoo Fauci.
He is certainly Prime Suspect #1.
Ask to swab your mouth, if they argue ask why we need a mask if they can't test in your mouth. This has worked for several people that I know.
Has been vids circulating of little black strands in the masks + test swabs, but I have no idea what they would be- a government (I forget which) did indicate it might be graphene, though I've not seen confirmation.
I avoid, but then the government told me it would be fine, so I ran.
The consequences are that you have a better than 80% chance of "testing positive", inconveniencing yourself and adding to the number of "cases". It's not a test; it's a procedure that was designed to look for viral fragments. If you recently had a cold, a flu jab or fucked a goat, you'll have viral fragments.
Contributing to child exploitation perhaps?
https://rumble.com/vgjng9-asian-children-pack-ccp-plague-test-sticks.html
https://www.brighteon.com/fe753093-6d24-47d2-ae23-fc47f5cc579e
You'll have to search this out, but I have read reports of the CDC's "tests" being contaminated. I don't recall with what, or if it was harmful, or just screwed up the results (which are bogus to begin with.
And more seriously, the nasal swab piercing the brain-body barrier and causing leakage.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/85qxWfCw22f6/
Why do you need a test? Only those with symptoms might need to get tested.
Just say it came back negative.