This article has a lot of good info about the process that will be used in the Windham, NH audit. Even though they don't have a lot of ballots (as evidenced by the 2 tables of boxes seen yesterday), the auditors expect the process to take ~4 weeks!
What was very interesting to me was the mention of the IBM 5150 chip knockoff. These machines are old! Plus, I could swear I had read where Donald Trump was looking for an IBM 5150 machine years ago. Of course I can't find where I saw that now.
https://patch.com/new-hampshire/windham/windham-2020-election-audit-will-take-weeks-team-members
Livestream here: https://www.doj.nh.gov/sb43/index.htm
Where was Ghislaine Maxwell arrested? Would you hide in a State that you could trust, or one you couldn't?
[DS] trusts New Hampshire. New Hampshire makes zero difference electorally - if you can only overturn three states, with AZ guaranteed, in no combination with WI, MI, GA or PA does NH make a difference. However, NH verifying an inflated and fake Biden victory in the state validates [DS] with their supporters and fence-sitters. At best, it is nothing more than a proving ground for a counter-AZ-audit performed by the [DS].
In their pride, the [DS] has also forgotten New Hampshire is the trap state. Don't expect anything to come from the audit except more dirt that proves [DS] corruption during the end-game.
They aren't auditing the national election, only local and state, so it won't "verify" nor will it discredit the presidential election. The findings will very likely trigger audits in the rest of the state.
This isn't just about the presidential election. Our state had a sweeping red wave in the state congress, and yet still elected 2 Leftist Democrat senators. Flipping that would be immensely helpful.
Here, here, I drive for a living and see a lot of people (and road signs), either the Xiden supporters hardly existed or they were too embarrassed to admit it on their lawn. There is no way NH elected a republican slate, then went democrat for congress and prez. I'm hoping Eyring and M. Todd (fundraiser, https://www.givesendgo.com/nhvoterintegrity) can still pull something off. Likely delusional hope, I know, but I'm not versed in legal avenues. Disclaimer I don't know and have never met Todd, just support her efforts. If Windham shows proof of error, the 85% of the State that used Accuvote should be audited, and maybe with enough citizen involvement (writing, emailing, calling) that will happen. Our legislative body has done well with this issue thus far. I have faith in the people of this great State.
Just to be clear, too, 85% of the state, means 85% of townships, not 85% of distributed voters. The 15% that don't use them are mostly very small-population towns, which means a much higher percentage of the the state's votes do use these machines.
That said, I'm still unsure much will come from the machine audits, since anyone in this state knows the real issue is the same-day voter registration and voter ID loopholes, that don't get audited. Even the conservatives I've talked to in the NH government don't believe the AccuVote machines are a problem (which I'm inclined to believe based on their regular bipartisan tests, and that they were purchased years before the company was acquired by Dominion). I certainly hope something comes out of these audits, but until we audit the same-day registered and affidavit voters, we won't be able to solve the whole problem of fraudulent votes in NH.
Additionally, as you'd expect most of the blue votes come out of the "cities" like Nashua, Manchester and Portsmouth.