You realise your statement is tautological and meaningless in an actual debate?
The Coriolis Effect presupposes the Earth is more or less a sphere.
You are trying to maintain a normalcy bias in a time that is not normal. I, too, do not want to say the Earth is flat, but fella, it's looking like more and more of a possibility every day. The fundamental mistake Evolutionists make is to assume ancient man was stupid. There are two reasons why this doesn't make sense:
Species evolve over MILLIONS of years, if evolution is correct, due to random mutation. As such, there is no way humans of a few thousand years ago had a diminished intellect when compared to our own. In fact, they ingested far less sugar, preservatives, vaccines/meds, and other toxic substances, and experienced far less electromagnetic radiation than we do.
Methods and materials show that ancient humans had technology that surpasses even what we are capable of today.
You can keep defending the conclusion, and presuppose you are already right, or you can evaluate evidence and pretend you may be wrong.
We have pyramids that we either could not build for lack of technology, or lack of surplus resources/time/labor, we have concrete used in ancient times that we didn't start using until the 1900's, we have a fort in Florida that is composed of millions of bricks that had to be transported by boats that did not exist in the 16/17/18th centuries. We have precisely cut edges on humongous rock, placed within other rock, with a weight that we can't even lift today (50 cruise ships worth of weight - we drydock ONE cruise ship to build it, and then flood it to lift it back up). Cocaine and tobacco residue on mummies, Egyptian artifacts dug up in the Americas, pyramids EVERYWHERE, ancient holes bored in granite, holes the diameter of needles bored in jewelry and other stone items, pots bored out from the outside in, and glassware, all produced by ancient human beings. The maps and descriptions of the Earth, from then on, and for another several millennia, all show the Earth as flat. The flag of the UN shows the Earth is flat, maps showed a flat Earth until when? No one is allowed to go to Antarctica, a Navy admiral goes and returns with an insane story (a...Navy....admiral.............admiral). Said admiral returned to state there was a land mass the size of North America past the ice wall. Occult knowledge of flat earth, preserved via manuscripts, images, and secret accounts/ritual. Buzz Aldrin even said we never went to the moon, Obama said we hope to one day be able to travel past low earth orbit.
You think Werner von Braun, an ex-Nazi, had such a well-developed and futuristically sarcastic sense of humor so as to "troll" the world on his own tombstone?
You haven't seen the footage of NASA setting up a false shot of Earth through a porticulis in a low-earth orbit vehicle? Or the astronauts being held up by wires? Or the air bubbles in space?
Why haven't we returned to the moon?
The Coriolis Effect (which is also a debunked line of crap) PRESUPPOSES your conclusion, which you also use as the primary SUPPORT of the same conclusion. It's a fallacy.
Of course maps show a flat earth, paper is flat. Draw the map on something stretchy and wrap it round a sphere - now the "earth" is a ball - it is the same map.
A flat earth would have daylight everywhere when the sun rises, but you can call people on the other side of the planet, and they will tell you: its dark here.
Flat earth is there to discredit some of the other things that are true, such as there being many "ages" on this planet. Periodically there is a cataclysm that kills almost everyone and scours the surface with tsunamis and buries everything under miles of mud. The cataclysm is probably a "skin shift", or crust displacement, which would look like a magnetic pole shift, in the same way as a bullet path looks like a curve, although it is straight within an absolute frame of reference without gravity.
Sunlight would be everywhere if the only thing that would change in a flat earth is the earth just being flat. Flat earth carries with it a series of pathways? layers? in which plasmic or celestial bodies travel around the world and are not the size the sun is in the heliocentric model. Again, you are denying flat earth by presupposing the heliocentric model as being true.
How and why did ancient or far past civilizations figure out the sundial? If it was daylight everywhere then sundials would not work. They knew the earth was a sphere, millennia ago? How are the planets and other bodies represented in ancient Sumerian carvings? Scientists have postulated that the atmosphere was different even a few millenia ago (why Saturn was worshipped as the "black sun" because it would have been visible). How does the moon perform a total equinox why would it orbit the earth, and the earth orbit the sun, exactly on an axis to allow conditions for total eclipse often throughout history?
The original crash, outward, of water would have literally seperated the waters above and below and created the firmament. The cataclysms also coincide with the star alignments. Why do we see the same stars if we are careening through space?
The pole shift may be the excuse, and it definitely relates to the cataclysmic cycle where something is ripped - but remove presupposition and the question of why these things occur becomes very interesting.
It's just, from years of studying philosophy, religion, history, etc combined with FOIA vault declas and the notion that we have been lied to, about a lot of things, it seems plausible. I don't want and never did want to think that, but it's becoming harder to ignore.
You realise your statement is tautological and meaningless in an actual debate?
The Coriolis Effect presupposes the Earth is more or less a sphere.
You are trying to maintain a normalcy bias in a time that is not normal. I, too, do not want to say the Earth is flat, but fella, it's looking like more and more of a possibility every day. The fundamental mistake Evolutionists make is to assume ancient man was stupid. There are two reasons why this doesn't make sense:
Species evolve over MILLIONS of years, if evolution is correct, due to random mutation. As such, there is no way humans of a few thousand years ago had a diminished intellect when compared to our own. In fact, they ingested far less sugar, preservatives, vaccines/meds, and other toxic substances, and experienced far less electromagnetic radiation than we do.
Methods and materials show that ancient humans had technology that surpasses even what we are capable of today.
You can keep defending the conclusion, and presuppose you are already right, or you can evaluate evidence and pretend you may be wrong.
We have pyramids that we either could not build for lack of technology, or lack of surplus resources/time/labor, we have concrete used in ancient times that we didn't start using until the 1900's, we have a fort in Florida that is composed of millions of bricks that had to be transported by boats that did not exist in the 16/17/18th centuries. We have precisely cut edges on humongous rock, placed within other rock, with a weight that we can't even lift today (50 cruise ships worth of weight - we drydock ONE cruise ship to build it, and then flood it to lift it back up). Cocaine and tobacco residue on mummies, Egyptian artifacts dug up in the Americas, pyramids EVERYWHERE, ancient holes bored in granite, holes the diameter of needles bored in jewelry and other stone items, pots bored out from the outside in, and glassware, all produced by ancient human beings. The maps and descriptions of the Earth, from then on, and for another several millennia, all show the Earth as flat. The flag of the UN shows the Earth is flat, maps showed a flat Earth until when? No one is allowed to go to Antarctica, a Navy admiral goes and returns with an insane story (a...Navy....admiral.............admiral). Said admiral returned to state there was a land mass the size of North America past the ice wall. Occult knowledge of flat earth, preserved via manuscripts, images, and secret accounts/ritual. Buzz Aldrin even said we never went to the moon, Obama said we hope to one day be able to travel past low earth orbit.
You think Werner von Braun, an ex-Nazi, had such a well-developed and futuristically sarcastic sense of humor so as to "troll" the world on his own tombstone?
You haven't seen the footage of NASA setting up a false shot of Earth through a porticulis in a low-earth orbit vehicle? Or the astronauts being held up by wires? Or the air bubbles in space?
Why haven't we returned to the moon?
The Coriolis Effect (which is also a debunked line of crap) PRESUPPOSES your conclusion, which you also use as the primary SUPPORT of the same conclusion. It's a fallacy.
Of course maps show a flat earth, paper is flat. Draw the map on something stretchy and wrap it round a sphere - now the "earth" is a ball - it is the same map.
A flat earth would have daylight everywhere when the sun rises, but you can call people on the other side of the planet, and they will tell you: its dark here.
Flat earth is there to discredit some of the other things that are true, such as there being many "ages" on this planet. Periodically there is a cataclysm that kills almost everyone and scours the surface with tsunamis and buries everything under miles of mud. The cataclysm is probably a "skin shift", or crust displacement, which would look like a magnetic pole shift, in the same way as a bullet path looks like a curve, although it is straight within an absolute frame of reference without gravity.
Sunlight would be everywhere if the only thing that would change in a flat earth is the earth just being flat. Flat earth carries with it a series of pathways? layers? in which plasmic or celestial bodies travel around the world and are not the size the sun is in the heliocentric model. Again, you are denying flat earth by presupposing the heliocentric model as being true.
How and why did ancient or far past civilizations figure out the sundial? If it was daylight everywhere then sundials would not work. They knew the earth was a sphere, millennia ago? How are the planets and other bodies represented in ancient Sumerian carvings? Scientists have postulated that the atmosphere was different even a few millenia ago (why Saturn was worshipped as the "black sun" because it would have been visible). How does the moon perform a total equinox why would it orbit the earth, and the earth orbit the sun, exactly on an axis to allow conditions for total eclipse often throughout history?
The original crash, outward, of water would have literally seperated the waters above and below and created the firmament. The cataclysms also coincide with the star alignments. Why do we see the same stars if we are careening through space?
The pole shift may be the excuse, and it definitely relates to the cataclysmic cycle where something is ripped - but remove presupposition and the question of why these things occur becomes very interesting.
It's just, from years of studying philosophy, religion, history, etc combined with FOIA vault declas and the notion that we have been lied to, about a lot of things, it seems plausible. I don't want and never did want to think that, but it's becoming harder to ignore.
I'm waiting for the response to this @PaineThomas <popcorn>