It has to do with the Capital being under the control of the speak of the house. Its a separation of powers thing. The Capital building/grounds itself is one of the few places(and the SCOTUS) POTUS has no control over. Trump can recommend and offer to provide NG troops, but the Speaker has to agree before they can actually show up at the Capital. Trump sending 10k troops against the Speaker's wishes would be one step away from a coup.
To the best of my knowledge the Capital Police chief guy that resigned agreed on Jan 5th that they needed more people, although I think he only wanted like 500-1k extra. Pelosi I'm pretty sure added nothing to the regular force that's always there. Any extra men would have interfered with their false flag insurrection. They needed the chaos to then be able to blame the deplorables in the mockingbird media and begin hunting conservatives.
But the whole narrative breaks down when you look at the hard facts. Trump asked to be allowed send extra men... LOTS of extra men... so they could stop his own insurrection that he gave a speech to start??? Kek... get it.
I heard a couple of weeks ago that Pelosi wanted her minions armed with "machine guns" inside the Capitol on that day but her request was refused. A blood bath was the goal and instead one woman was shot and there was no violence apart from that. So they had to make a flag-waving granny, one broken mirror, and a stolen laptop sound like WWIII.
(Sorry can't even remember where I heard this or I'd link to it - but at least it's a search/start point)
From John here to help (he was the one who raised the alarm in April 2020 that they knew they couldn't win so were literally gonna steal it. Everything happened as he said)
I heard the same thing but I think what has you confused is that was AFTER the Jan 6th attack(I'm only about 98% sure this is the case). She wanted the horde of NG sent to protect the capital after the "attack" on Jan 6th to have machine guns etc and the NG told her she needed to get a grip. Then only a week or two later they began to question the loyalty of those NG troops because of Q etc so they had the FBI interview them and took a lot of their weapons away from them.
I'll post a link if I recall the source, but I do remember it was specific that she wanted the guns ON the 6th, ostensibly so that the desired tragedy could occur. You know how much DS operatives like Pelosi enjoy their "mass shootings". Also that they were "recruiting" other young women like Ashli, trying to convince them to head in the same direction. But I guess they only got one taker.
If the stuff I've been reading is correct the whole point was to setup conservatives to attack some congressmen/senators in order to feed the insurrection narrative. The problem they clearly had is that they, the cabal members, didn't want to be the ones that got beat up. So there was an area that they deemed off limits. The people entering the building were too calm... too nice. There wasn't a lot of violence and looting/burning like they hoped. It was inevitable that someone would reach that no go area and end up shot by security.
Mind you this is my interpretation of the facts I've seen.
Watch the video of her being shot. A man uses his helmet to break out the window and the police not 2 min beforehand MOVED OUT OF THE WAY. The guy with the helmet in presumed to be antifa/BLM. He knew it might put him in danger to go past the window. So he broke it out and sent Babbit up and over just to see what would happen. Security guard has orders or he panics and boom one shot right to the neck(probibly was aiming for the head and missed), dead patriot.
If things went the way they appeared to then Pelosi and several others all knew they were putting thousands of people in danger. All 3-5 of the people that died should at the very least be separate counts of manslaughter. They created the situations that caused people to die. IMHO there is a case to be made that Babbit is a case of like 2nd or 3rd degree murder. They set her up to die.
The one thing I'm absolutely sure of is that they wanted people to at least attack the outside of the building so they could claim conservatives were crazy insurrectionist lunatics and clamp down on us take our guns etc. It will most likely be years before we know the whole truth of who really planned what.
It has to do with the Capital being under the control of the speak of the house. Its a separation of powers thing. The Capital building/grounds itself is one of the few places(and the SCOTUS) POTUS has no control over. Trump can recommend and offer to provide NG troops, but the Speaker has to agree before they can actually show up at the Capital. Trump sending 10k troops against the Speaker's wishes would be one step away from a coup.
To the best of my knowledge the Capital Police chief guy that resigned agreed on Jan 5th that they needed more people, although I think he only wanted like 500-1k extra. Pelosi I'm pretty sure added nothing to the regular force that's always there. Any extra men would have interfered with their false flag insurrection. They needed the chaos to then be able to blame the deplorables in the mockingbird media and begin hunting conservatives.
But the whole narrative breaks down when you look at the hard facts. Trump asked to be allowed send extra men... LOTS of extra men... so they could stop his own insurrection that he gave a speech to start??? Kek... get it.
I heard a couple of weeks ago that Pelosi wanted her minions armed with "machine guns" inside the Capitol on that day but her request was refused. A blood bath was the goal and instead one woman was shot and there was no violence apart from that. So they had to make a flag-waving granny, one broken mirror, and a stolen laptop sound like WWIII.
(Sorry can't even remember where I heard this or I'd link to it - but at least it's a search/start point)
From John here to help (he was the one who raised the alarm in April 2020 that they knew they couldn't win so were literally gonna steal it. Everything happened as he said)
This is the info he has re Jan 6th https://twitter.com/Johnheretohelp/status/1389333419159658505
That's it! TY fren ;-)
Holy crap that woman is evil
Where are a few good snipers when you need them? These problems would all go away post-haste.
I heard the same thing but I think what has you confused is that was AFTER the Jan 6th attack(I'm only about 98% sure this is the case). She wanted the horde of NG sent to protect the capital after the "attack" on Jan 6th to have machine guns etc and the NG told her she needed to get a grip. Then only a week or two later they began to question the loyalty of those NG troops because of Q etc so they had the FBI interview them and took a lot of their weapons away from them.
Could certainly be!
I'll post a link if I recall the source, but I do remember it was specific that she wanted the guns ON the 6th, ostensibly so that the desired tragedy could occur. You know how much DS operatives like Pelosi enjoy their "mass shootings". Also that they were "recruiting" other young women like Ashli, trying to convince them to head in the same direction. But I guess they only got one taker.
So she was fucking complicit in the alleged murder of Ashley Babbit...
If the stuff I've been reading is correct the whole point was to setup conservatives to attack some congressmen/senators in order to feed the insurrection narrative. The problem they clearly had is that they, the cabal members, didn't want to be the ones that got beat up. So there was an area that they deemed off limits. The people entering the building were too calm... too nice. There wasn't a lot of violence and looting/burning like they hoped. It was inevitable that someone would reach that no go area and end up shot by security.
Mind you this is my interpretation of the facts I've seen.
Watch the video of her being shot. A man uses his helmet to break out the window and the police not 2 min beforehand MOVED OUT OF THE WAY. The guy with the helmet in presumed to be antifa/BLM. He knew it might put him in danger to go past the window. So he broke it out and sent Babbit up and over just to see what would happen. Security guard has orders or he panics and boom one shot right to the neck(probibly was aiming for the head and missed), dead patriot.
If things went the way they appeared to then Pelosi and several others all knew they were putting thousands of people in danger. All 3-5 of the people that died should at the very least be separate counts of manslaughter. They created the situations that caused people to die. IMHO there is a case to be made that Babbit is a case of like 2nd or 3rd degree murder. They set her up to die.
The one thing I'm absolutely sure of is that they wanted people to at least attack the outside of the building so they could claim conservatives were crazy insurrectionist lunatics and clamp down on us take our guns etc. It will most likely be years before we know the whole truth of who really planned what.