Reddit-tier entertainment golems will never hear about any of this because it'll all be censored. If there's danger of it making the MSM, our communist party leaders will false flag shoot up a school as a distraction.
It has to do with the Capital being under the control of the speak of the house. Its a separation of powers thing. The Capital building/grounds itself is one of the few places(and the SCOTUS) POTUS has no control over. Trump can recommend and offer to provide NG troops, but the Speaker has to agree before they can actually show up at the Capital. Trump sending 10k troops against the Speaker's wishes would be one step away from a coup.
To the best of my knowledge the Capital Police chief guy that resigned agreed on Jan 5th that they needed more people, although I think he only wanted like 500-1k extra. Pelosi I'm pretty sure added nothing to the regular force that's always there. Any extra men would have interfered with their false flag insurrection. They needed the chaos to then be able to blame the deplorables in the mockingbird media and begin hunting conservatives.
But the whole narrative breaks down when you look at the hard facts. Trump asked to be allowed send extra men... LOTS of extra men... so they could stop his own insurrection that he gave a speech to start??? Kek... get it.
I heard a couple of weeks ago that Pelosi wanted her minions armed with "machine guns" inside the Capitol on that day but her request was refused. A blood bath was the goal and instead one woman was shot and there was no violence apart from that. So they had to make a flag-waving granny, one broken mirror, and a stolen laptop sound like WWIII.
(Sorry can't even remember where I heard this or I'd link to it - but at least it's a search/start point)
From John here to help (he was the one who raised the alarm in April 2020 that they knew they couldn't win so were literally gonna steal it. Everything happened as he said)
I heard the same thing but I think what has you confused is that was AFTER the Jan 6th attack(I'm only about 98% sure this is the case). She wanted the horde of NG sent to protect the capital after the "attack" on Jan 6th to have machine guns etc and the NG told her she needed to get a grip. Then only a week or two later they began to question the loyalty of those NG troops because of Q etc so they had the FBI interview them and took a lot of their weapons away from them.
I'll post a link if I recall the source, but I do remember it was specific that she wanted the guns ON the 6th, ostensibly so that the desired tragedy could occur. You know how much DS operatives like Pelosi enjoy their "mass shootings". Also that they were "recruiting" other young women like Ashli, trying to convince them to head in the same direction. But I guess they only got one taker.
If the stuff I've been reading is correct the whole point was to setup conservatives to attack some congressmen/senators in order to feed the insurrection narrative. The problem they clearly had is that they, the cabal members, didn't want to be the ones that got beat up. So there was an area that they deemed off limits. The people entering the building were too calm... too nice. There wasn't a lot of violence and looting/burning like they hoped. It was inevitable that someone would reach that no go area and end up shot by security.
Mind you this is my interpretation of the facts I've seen.
Watch the video of her being shot. A man uses his helmet to break out the window and the police not 2 min beforehand MOVED OUT OF THE WAY. The guy with the helmet in presumed to be antifa/BLM. He knew it might put him in danger to go past the window. So he broke it out and sent Babbit up and over just to see what would happen. Security guard has orders or he panics and boom one shot right to the neck(probibly was aiming for the head and missed), dead patriot.
If things went the way they appeared to then Pelosi and several others all knew they were putting thousands of people in danger. All 3-5 of the people that died should at the very least be separate counts of manslaughter. They created the situations that caused people to die. IMHO there is a case to be made that Babbit is a case of like 2nd or 3rd degree murder. They set her up to die.
The one thing I'm absolutely sure of is that they wanted people to at least attack the outside of the building so they could claim conservatives were crazy insurrectionist lunatics and clamp down on us take our guns etc. It will most likely be years before we know the whole truth of who really planned what.
If you can, donate money to her. I believe she and Matt Gaetz and Ted Cruz are the only three Republicans in Congress who do not take corporate PAC money.
I can't wait for all of America to see who was really responsible for Jan. 6th. Remember they have been calling it the worst attack on America since the civil war. We get to use their words forever against them.
The speaker of the house has absolutely no authority over any national guard element. Governors can activate their respective states’ guards, or the president can mobilize them to assist active duty troops (and the president can activate the DC NG).
You people always talk about “doing your own research,” but can’t spend 5 minutes googling this topic.
Pipe bombs are a real threat. Antifa/BLM/Leftist rioters posing as conservatives are a real threat. The President had the right answer, she ignored it because politics. Criminal-level negligence, nothing less, but more like treason of the intentional kind.
The speaker is not in charge of the entire Capitol complex anymore than (Republican Sen.) Mitch McConnell was as majority leader,” he said, adding that consulting with the minority party, particularly immediately after a violent attack, is not a requirement.
I remember reading when this all happened she deliberately denied Capital Police from providing the extra support that was recommended. For "optics". Which "optics" she wished to display is pretty obvious to me.
Thank you for the link to the ARNG Fact Sheet (with no context - fair enough)! I think what you're getting at is the section detailing the POTUS is "at the State level" responsible for the DC ARNG. Again, fair enough.
Thank you for at least forcing me to do more of my own research to support my claims. If I'm STILL in error, I would honestly appreciate clarification.
Trump new this was going to be a set-up, orchestrated by the DS/Dem/ons and different agencies and services. So, basically, it was the up-set-upping of a set-up. ;)
Pelosi bullet squad under orders to produce a death to amp up the media narrative? Yeah, if normies knew how evil these fucks are, it's over.
Love MTG. If you are here MTG, you are my hero.
Reddit-tier entertainment golems will never hear about any of this because it'll all be censored. If there's danger of it making the MSM, our communist party leaders will false flag shoot up a school as a distraction.
It has to do with the Capital being under the control of the speak of the house. Its a separation of powers thing. The Capital building/grounds itself is one of the few places(and the SCOTUS) POTUS has no control over. Trump can recommend and offer to provide NG troops, but the Speaker has to agree before they can actually show up at the Capital. Trump sending 10k troops against the Speaker's wishes would be one step away from a coup.
To the best of my knowledge the Capital Police chief guy that resigned agreed on Jan 5th that they needed more people, although I think he only wanted like 500-1k extra. Pelosi I'm pretty sure added nothing to the regular force that's always there. Any extra men would have interfered with their false flag insurrection. They needed the chaos to then be able to blame the deplorables in the mockingbird media and begin hunting conservatives.
But the whole narrative breaks down when you look at the hard facts. Trump asked to be allowed send extra men... LOTS of extra men... so they could stop his own insurrection that he gave a speech to start??? Kek... get it.
I heard a couple of weeks ago that Pelosi wanted her minions armed with "machine guns" inside the Capitol on that day but her request was refused. A blood bath was the goal and instead one woman was shot and there was no violence apart from that. So they had to make a flag-waving granny, one broken mirror, and a stolen laptop sound like WWIII.
(Sorry can't even remember where I heard this or I'd link to it - but at least it's a search/start point)
From John here to help (he was the one who raised the alarm in April 2020 that they knew they couldn't win so were literally gonna steal it. Everything happened as he said)
This is the info he has re Jan 6th https://twitter.com/Johnheretohelp/status/1389333419159658505
That's it! TY fren ;-)
Holy crap that woman is evil
Where are a few good snipers when you need them? These problems would all go away post-haste.
I heard the same thing but I think what has you confused is that was AFTER the Jan 6th attack(I'm only about 98% sure this is the case). She wanted the horde of NG sent to protect the capital after the "attack" on Jan 6th to have machine guns etc and the NG told her she needed to get a grip. Then only a week or two later they began to question the loyalty of those NG troops because of Q etc so they had the FBI interview them and took a lot of their weapons away from them.
Could certainly be!
I'll post a link if I recall the source, but I do remember it was specific that she wanted the guns ON the 6th, ostensibly so that the desired tragedy could occur. You know how much DS operatives like Pelosi enjoy their "mass shootings". Also that they were "recruiting" other young women like Ashli, trying to convince them to head in the same direction. But I guess they only got one taker.
So she was fucking complicit in the alleged murder of Ashley Babbit...
If the stuff I've been reading is correct the whole point was to setup conservatives to attack some congressmen/senators in order to feed the insurrection narrative. The problem they clearly had is that they, the cabal members, didn't want to be the ones that got beat up. So there was an area that they deemed off limits. The people entering the building were too calm... too nice. There wasn't a lot of violence and looting/burning like they hoped. It was inevitable that someone would reach that no go area and end up shot by security.
Mind you this is my interpretation of the facts I've seen.
Watch the video of her being shot. A man uses his helmet to break out the window and the police not 2 min beforehand MOVED OUT OF THE WAY. The guy with the helmet in presumed to be antifa/BLM. He knew it might put him in danger to go past the window. So he broke it out and sent Babbit up and over just to see what would happen. Security guard has orders or he panics and boom one shot right to the neck(probibly was aiming for the head and missed), dead patriot.
If things went the way they appeared to then Pelosi and several others all knew they were putting thousands of people in danger. All 3-5 of the people that died should at the very least be separate counts of manslaughter. They created the situations that caused people to die. IMHO there is a case to be made that Babbit is a case of like 2nd or 3rd degree murder. They set her up to die.
The one thing I'm absolutely sure of is that they wanted people to at least attack the outside of the building so they could claim conservatives were crazy insurrectionist lunatics and clamp down on us take our guns etc. It will most likely be years before we know the whole truth of who really planned what.
My question too
Piglosi is speak of the House and controls security at the Capital.
No, she doesn’t.
Sargent in Arms takes direction from Piglosi.
https://www.bizpacreview.com/2021/01/18/pelosi-was-in-charge-of-capitol-security-during-breach-we-will-get-to-bottom-of-that-says-lindsey-graham-1017755/
It’s not
Keep bringing the heat MTG! ?
If you can, donate money to her. I believe she and Matt Gaetz and Ted Cruz are the only three Republicans in Congress who do not take corporate PAC money.
https://secure.winred.com/marjorie-greene-for-congress/donate
This is why they always have a target on their backs. They are not controlled.
Cruz, really?
Mr. Goldman Sachs isn't taking corporate money?
Please educate me on this. Seriously, Im not being facetious.
That's what Gaetz said at the last rally with MTG.
I can't wait for all of America to see who was really responsible for Jan. 6th. Remember they have been calling it the worst attack on America since the civil war. We get to use their words forever against them.
?
^^
they really say that? a few bumbling old grannies ambling around the Capitol? Worse than 9/11?
Wot?
She wanted something to happen so they could turn around and spin it in there favor
Fresh. Minty and NEEDS answers ASAP
Mic drop. BOOM!
Damn! She a dem slayer! They unleashed a fucking Siberian tiger! Good luck ya drunk crypt keeper!
How can you not love her ? Extra spicey
I seriously want MTG as my BFF.
A FF includes ALLOWING something to happen. Aka not stopping it.
Our men in congress need to grow a spine like MTG
Thats a nice backhand to peloci's shot on the ethics committee.
Every single time, I read it as “magic the gathering”. Never even played it.
Same
The speaker of the house has absolutely no authority over any national guard element. Governors can activate their respective states’ guards, or the president can mobilize them to assist active duty troops (and the president can activate the DC NG).
You people always talk about “doing your own research,” but can’t spend 5 minutes googling this topic.
https://www.nationalguard.mil/About-the-Guard/Army-National-Guard/Resources/News/ARNG-Media/FileId/137011/
Pipe bombs are a real threat. Antifa/BLM/Leftist rioters posing as conservatives are a real threat. The President had the right answer, she ignored it because politics. Criminal-level negligence, nothing less, but more like treason of the intentional kind.
I didn't even know he requested troops. Let alone 24 hours before the event.
The speaker is not in charge of the entire Capitol complex anymore than (Republican Sen.) Mitch McConnell was as majority leader,” he said, adding that consulting with the minority party, particularly immediately after a violent attack, is not a requirement.
At this point what difference does it make
I'm don't with the internet today. Thank you.
Whut?
I will tell you why-Pelosi planned this entire charade
Pelosi's not in charge of Capitol grounds, or the National Guard if Geotus wanted those troops there, then shouldn't they have been there?.
What held them back?
I remember reading when this all happened she deliberately denied Capital Police from providing the extra support that was recommended. For "optics". Which "optics" she wished to display is pretty obvious to me.
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
You’re wrong
https://www.nationalguard.mil/About-the-Guard/Army-National-Guard/Resources/News/ARNG-Media/FileId/137011/
Thank you for the link to the ARNG Fact Sheet (with no context - fair enough)! I think what you're getting at is the section detailing the POTUS is "at the State level" responsible for the DC ARNG. Again, fair enough.
Can you please reconcile those facts with this? Speaker Nancy Pelosi and GOP Leader Mitch McConnell refused National Guard support before the announced protests on January 6th.
And this, which indicates Capital Police were, indirectly, led to failure.
More Here.
Thank you for at least forcing me to do more of my own research to support my claims. If I'm STILL in error, I would honestly appreciate clarification.
Tapping so much land for mana
If Nancy Pelosi wants to take on MTG, Nancy's going to find out very quickly that she's WAY out of her league.
Pelosi has a lot of unaddressed skeletons.....
Plenty to discover about this topic.
I'll say it again, MTG is clearly headed for higher office and quite possibly for the WH in the #2 or even the #1 slot in a dozen years or so.
1/6 will be know as the Pelosi Insurrection.
Trump new this was going to be a set-up, orchestrated by the DS/Dem/ons and different agencies and services. So, basically, it was the up-set-upping of a set-up. ;)
Every day she goes up in my book!!
Get it girl!!