The position I took was that I am against terrorism.
I don't know why you're bringing Hitler into the conversation as it bears no relevance on recent events.
You believe Hamas started the trouble, others believe it was in response to Israeli aggression at the Al Aqsa mosque.
I wasn't there so I can only go on what's reported.
Personally I don't think either side is innocent but attacking a holy site is a red line and the Israelis knew it would spark a response.
I also do not condone the response from Hamas just as I didn't condone the IRA targeting civilians but I can understand their anger.
They performed an air to surface rouse on another location so that they could then attack people who were not in that location or preparing to fight their forces.
Either you believe their intel and assume all those underground were actually terrorists, or you question it and reason that they killed a bunch of people underground who may/may not have anything to do with the conflict.
I'm absolutely against terrorism but I can't condone Israel's actions as they provoked this in the first place.
How would you react if for example 'settlers' came from the Dem run cities and evicted you from your home with the Govt's backing?
Then attacked you in your church?
Sorry but that just ain't right.
I'm talking about events in recent weeks which have reignited tensions.
If the US occupied Mexican land and treated the Mexicans the same way Israel treat the Palestinians, I wouldn't think that was right either.
You can't stop these endless wars without looking at things from both sides.
This may help understand what I'm referring to. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoVTss_3TMk
So... Texas...
Did you support the IRA bombing innocent people?
I don't support anyone bombing innocent people, be that freedom fighters or military.
You didn't take that position in the first example you used.
The fact of the matter is the Arab world helped support Hitler in his campaign against the Jews.
As a penalty for their crimes, they had to endure the forceful retaking of land once known as Israel.
There had just started to be peace and Hamas fires rockets.
Israel bombing them back is not unjustified.
Careful, stating that Hilter actually killed jews is dangerous on this site.
The position I took was that I am against terrorism.
I don't know why you're bringing Hitler into the conversation as it bears no relevance on recent events.
You believe Hamas started the trouble, others believe it was in response to Israeli aggression at the Al Aqsa mosque. I wasn't there so I can only go on what's reported.
Personally I don't think either side is innocent but attacking a holy site is a red line and the Israelis knew it would spark a response.
I also do not condone the response from Hamas just as I didn't condone the IRA targeting civilians but I can understand their anger.
Mark Levin said these were houses / land stolen a long time ago and the current occupants were squatters. Israel was just taking them back.
How far back in history does that rule apply?
Would that rule then apply for Native Americans too?
At some point concessions need to be made and agreements put in place to ensure peace.
Seems sketchy tbh.
They performed an air to surface rouse on another location so that they could then attack people who were not in that location or preparing to fight their forces.
Either you believe their intel and assume all those underground were actually terrorists, or you question it and reason that they killed a bunch of people underground who may/may not have anything to do with the conflict.