Hope this is allowed! I've browsed on this site for a while, even had another username where I engaged in some fairly civil debates with other users before I was banned due to not being a Q follower.
Interested in having a friendly discussion with anyone who's up for it!
A bit about me:
I'm a mechanical engineer working in product marketing I live in a major city, Chicago, and have pretty much only voted democrat I am a homeowner I have followed conspiracies for a while based solely on my own curiosity, and by and large found that a lot of the major ones (pizzagate, Q) don't make a ton of sense, but I'm not here to argue that. I think we're just gonna have different opinions on it.
All said, happy to have a casual AMA! Not interested in flamebaiting or arguing
Didn't Shokin have a lot of reasons why he shouldn't serve as the top prosecutor? Was he even investigating HUnter Biden at the time?
Your allegations require proof. I provided proof for mine, which you've side-stepped.
Oh I'm fully aware of the links you posted. But Biden was not the only one who pressured Ukraine to oust that prosecutor.
There were demonstrations calling for his resignation as early as 2015
https://www.unian.info/society/1170127-auto-maidan-protesters-arrived-at-poroshenkos-residence-demanding-shokins-resignation-photos.html
Furthermore, his investigations into the Burisma holdings was specifically for allegations of crimes between 2010-2012. Biden wasn't on the board at this time, so Hunter would not have been a part of that investigation
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-whistleblower-ukraine-buris/ukraine-agency-says-allegations-against-burisma-cover-period-before-biden-joined-idUSKBN1WC1LV
Thank you for your response.
As to your first link, a group of activists demanding his resignation is hardly persuasive. On the contrary, it actually weakens your position. Looking forward to a more substantial source.
As to your second point, the fact that Burisma was ALREADY under investigation, that is a TERRIBLE thing to admit... Because surely you can understand why further investigations would occur?? Further, all that article does is dance around the elephant in the room.
A previous investigation doesn't absolve anyone of subsequent investigations. In fact, the sources that I presented to you showed that there was a HUGE issue with Joe Biden and his son.
In one of your responses, you said that asking for the prosecutor's firing due to personal reasons would be a problem... THIS is that problem.
I look forward to any sources you can provide that can actually corroborate your position.
Sure! let me know if this link works for you:
https://www.ft.com/content/e1454ace-e61b-11e9-9743-db5a370481bc
To my second point, I'm not saying that Burisma was ALREADY under investigation, I'm saying that the investigation was on crimes and allegations that took place before Hunter Biden was put on the board.
Basically, what it means is Hunter Biden was on the board in 2015, but the investigation was on things that took place in 2010-2012, so Hunter's actions wouldn't have any affect on these investigations since the events under question Biden had no involvement with.