Hope this is allowed! I've browsed on this site for a while, even had another username where I engaged in some fairly civil debates with other users before I was banned due to not being a Q follower.
Interested in having a friendly discussion with anyone who's up for it!
A bit about me:
I'm a mechanical engineer working in product marketing I live in a major city, Chicago, and have pretty much only voted democrat I am a homeowner I have followed conspiracies for a while based solely on my own curiosity, and by and large found that a lot of the major ones (pizzagate, Q) don't make a ton of sense, but I'm not here to argue that. I think we're just gonna have different opinions on it.
All said, happy to have a casual AMA! Not interested in flamebaiting or arguing
The way I see it, if you use the situation with the prosecutor as a jumping off point, then it’s open to scrutiny. The early part of our discussion revolves entirely around the fact that he fired this prosecutor who was investigating naughty things. We spoke on that at length. It was only after I brought up the timeline that you suddenly said that these actions are irrelevant
It absolutely is not.
You're hilarious.
I can completely understand why you are a Biden voter. Your capacity for logic and thought is extremely lacking.
If you want to draft up an argument to support your case about why I am so wrong, then please, go right ahead. I have supported my claim. Nothing in my argument has changed.
Luckily for us though, the rules of thought and logic are solid and don't go along with the whims of someone who thinks it's one way when it isn't. Read a book.
Mkay.
So here are the facts. You were very gung-ho about the fact that Biden himself admitted to this blackmailing and that was the jumping off point to your research, as I understand.
So, to me, if I were in your shoes and wanted to do my due diligence on learning what is the meaning behind Biden sharing this, I would first look at the basic facts, to answer the question, “is what Biden just said true?” As a matter of fact, no! According to events that actually happened, including time where Biden was in Ukraine vs the time when the prosecutor was fired (7 months later) vs when the money was paid, the very basis of the argument, Biden’s quote, is already false! Thus, if you had done your research and started at the start, I’d be confused how you got any farther than this point.
So, if you are aware that this quote that Biden stated implying blackmail does not actually reflect the timeline of events, why did you continue to dig?
YAY! Actual discussion!!
The fun thing about research is that you keep asking questions.
If x is true, then what? If x is false, then what?
And then... if x is true, how would that look in the real world? And, if x is false, how would THAT look. And associated behaviors, etc, etc.
And, I can see immediately where we have a slight misunderstanding in that analysis. You sought to answer the question: "is what Biden just said true?" That isn't the question I asked to start. That wasn't MY jumping off point, if you will.
My analysis and hypothesis started from the premise of "why would such a statement be made at all?"
Why would the VP of a completely different country be interested in what a completely unrelated Prosecutor is doing..??
So, that is the point of reference that I started from.
So then if you come into the statement already looking for a crime, wouldn’t you subconsciously make connections that might not actually be the full picture?
And even still, why wouldn’t you look at the timeline of events early on in your research?