Well, yeah, but he's talking about a different process. According to his theory, the vaccines are not harmful and so if hurrying things up is your #1 priority, then you should push the process along. It's internally consistent with his main argument, and far less than advocacy in my book.
But his blog speaks for itself. I think it's an interesting theory, and I didn't see it as pushing the vax, and I'm still gonna pass on the injection.
He's shaming Q supporters into accepting the injection. He's saying "if you want the storm to come already, and you refuse to get the vaccine, then maybe you're the problem"
Umm did you miss this part?
Well, yeah, but he's talking about a different process. According to his theory, the vaccines are not harmful and so if hurrying things up is your #1 priority, then you should push the process along. It's internally consistent with his main argument, and far less than advocacy in my book.
But his blog speaks for itself. I think it's an interesting theory, and I didn't see it as pushing the vax, and I'm still gonna pass on the injection.
He's shaming Q supporters into accepting the injection. He's saying "if you want the storm to come already, and you refuse to get the vaccine, then maybe you're the problem"
That wasn't my takeaway, and not my impression generally. But a lot of people disagree, as that's the primary criticism he addresses.