It makes sense. *There are National Guard posts in almost every city in America.
*We can get rid of those crap machines.
*The military has a huge budget and can print ballots and create counting machines. If they can make a person fly thru the air at 6 times the speed of sound, they can write a program that tallies votes.
*There would be one chain of custody.
*Fake news stations all have the exact same information so no fuckary or early calling can be had.
*National Guards are military so anyone caught fucking around will actually find out.
*Create a whole new MOS dedicated to freedom like 76P (1776 Patriot)
*The National Guard is made up of guardsmen who reside in that state so states can still have their own rules as elected on but the National Guard will implement them.
*Having armed and uniformed soldiers will have the effect of scaring away any miscreants who are there with nefarious intent and will assure that all who are there feel safe.
*Epstein didn't kill himself and Donald Trump is still and has always been the President of the greatest Republic this world has ever seen.
WWG1WGA
The national guard commander and Miller were two they supposedly got rid of. The GOVERNMENT wants complete control of selections. Think on these things. Elections need to be run independently on the local level. Need to have an abundance of over sight of a hand count. No machines.
I agree not because of all you stated above but for one simple reason:
A monster like Ruby Freeman would never make it past orientation training.
99% of people who are most likely to tamper with the votes would never even get close to the ballots if they had to go through physical training.
People like that want to cheat at everything they do, including a national vote.
There is no cheating when sergeant says to do 100 push ups. If you're caught, you're doing 100 more and a 1 mile sprint.
Yeah. What I think should really happen is that the legislature should select an independent civilian group to oversee and do the counting and then a security apparatus, whether that be a private or a public security force. The security force selected should be completely subject to the civilian agency for the duration of the election and counting. They have the sole purpose of guarding the ballots. No one guard or group of guards can be posted to guard the ballots in the same week. At a preselected date the security force's contract expires and they are required to leave.
Just remember there can be all kinds of malfeasance by any group that counts the ballots. Do you really want ANY military in charge?
I would rather see INDEPENDENT bodies overseeing elections especially done locally. There needs to be tighter restrictions of elections (voter ID, limited voting days, no vote counting after election day, limited absentee balloting and when it is used only given when asked by voter and all ballots need to be signature verified).
More should be done to secure the election process.