I'm gonna start handing these out to people.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
If 95% (times all of us) is enough to eradicate it, then 99.7% (times all of us) should also do the trick.
Our natural immune response is more effective than the 'vaccine'.
I agree with your point, but there are no 'answers' that will satisfy them. It's not about logic, or science --- only ideology.
When fully-vaxxed people are saying that they won't take their mask off because they don't want to look like a conservative, you know they are no longer listening to reason.
You’ll never satisfy a lib. Why they’ve always got someone’s hand out and you’re racist.
True, but my response to that is, "95% effective against WHAT?"
This is something they have never researched. I know they haven't because they got the shot.
This then becomes the red pill opportunity.
The drug makers are NOT saying it is effective in preventing someone from GETTING Covid, and they are NOT saying it is effective at preventing them from TRANSMITTING it to someone else if they do have it.
These are the two reasons for getting any vaccine, but these two things do NOT apply to these experimental drugs.
The 95% claim of effectiveness is that the SYMPTOMS will be less. That is their claim, and their ONLY claim. Covid is said to usually have NO symptoms. Of the people who do get symptoms, these experimental drugs supposedly will reduce the symptoms in some people (meaning, they get an illness but don't know it because they have no symptoms, which means they pass it on more easily because they take no precaustions -- stupidity upon stupidity, but it is what it is).
On top of that, this 95% claim has NOT been proven because the drug makers have NOT produced their research for others to check. They have only produced summaries and made claims.
The entire thing is a sham.