"Governors need to ban private businesses from...." refusing to bake cakes to your gay wedding?
See how that goes? This is what happen when you refrain from thinking in principles and instead react with the way the pollster gaslights the answer before the question.
(The problem is that "private" businesses in question are Cabal corporations.)
I disagree. The reason why I am okay with desantis (or whoever) banning businesses from requiring vaccines is because the covid scam has been created by (more or less) government, and the majority of businesses that would require this are only requiring it because they are caving to the higher ups who are almost certainly being influenced by corruption and government power/money. Once government starts infecting business with bureaucracy and regulations and corporatism, it is not fair to call it "private" anymore. Just like airlines, big pharma, etc.
The same thing goes for the hippa excuse that I can't be made to tell someone whether I am vaccinated. In reality its actually just a bunch of liberal horseshit, but I don't mind abusing it given the situation.
"The reason why I am okay with desantis (or whoever) banning businesses from requiring vaccines is because the covid scam has been created by (more or less) government"
--Meaning the government created a problem and then used the problem to justify increasing its power.
"If I refuse to sell you groceries, you might just starve to death."
--The only way such a situation can arise is if the very same government you want to boss those corporations around has been been taken over (or established in the first place) by a cabal intending to use monetary and legal policy to acquire an absolute monopoly over food.
They're getting away with it because you keeping demanding that (their, not your) government swing a big stick.
Being forced to bake two dudes or chicks sucking face on a cake is WAY different than forcing your customers to obtruct their breathing. BREATHING is a basic human right!!!! I can't believe this is a foriegn concept to people now.
It's not the same. In that case baking thing, the customers volunteered information about themselves and tried to force expression from another human the said person was uncomfortable with, thus violating said person's right to pursue happiness and liberty to choose who they engage in a contract with.
In the cases of vaccines, some businesses may try to require that a person have a permenant change to his body that cannot be undone in order to engage in a contractual relationship, thus interfering in their right to self determination and pursuit of happiness.
"Governors need to ban private businesses from...." refusing to bake cakes to your gay wedding?
See how that goes? This is what happen when you refrain from thinking in principles and instead react with the way the pollster gaslights the answer before the question.
(The problem is that "private" businesses in question are Cabal corporations.)
I disagree. The reason why I am okay with desantis (or whoever) banning businesses from requiring vaccines is because the covid scam has been created by (more or less) government, and the majority of businesses that would require this are only requiring it because they are caving to the higher ups who are almost certainly being influenced by corruption and government power/money. Once government starts infecting business with bureaucracy and regulations and corporatism, it is not fair to call it "private" anymore. Just like airlines, big pharma, etc. The same thing goes for the hippa excuse that I can't be made to tell someone whether I am vaccinated. In reality its actually just a bunch of liberal horseshit, but I don't mind abusing it given the situation.
"The reason why I am okay with desantis (or whoever) banning businesses from requiring vaccines is because the covid scam has been created by (more or less) government"
--Meaning the government created a problem and then used the problem to justify increasing its power.
*"No business should be allowed to (grab a grievance out of a hat) to (please a customer). You're using a false equivalency."
--They're precisely equivalent.
"If I refuse to sell you groceries, you might just starve to death."
--The only way such a situation can arise is if the very same government you want to boss those corporations around has been been taken over (or established in the first place) by a cabal intending to use monetary and legal policy to acquire an absolute monopoly over food.
They're getting away with it because you keeping demanding that (their, not your) government swing a big stick.
Being forced to bake two dudes or chicks sucking face on a cake is WAY different than forcing your customers to obtruct their breathing. BREATHING is a basic human right!!!! I can't believe this is a foriegn concept to people now.
Nothing makes sense anymore. I feel like the guy at the end of "In the Mouth of Madness."
I'm glad my daughters won't have to cover their faces at school.
When words lose their meaning, people lose their freedom” --Confucius.
"...forcing your customers...."
If "force" is involved, then the person isn't a "customer".
It's not the same. In that case baking thing, the customers volunteered information about themselves and tried to force expression from another human the said person was uncomfortable with, thus violating said person's right to pursue happiness and liberty to choose who they engage in a contract with.
In the cases of vaccines, some businesses may try to require that a person have a permenant change to his body that cannot be undone in order to engage in a contractual relationship, thus interfering in their right to self determination and pursuit of happiness.