"Governors need to ban private businesses from..." -- And the pro-BIGGOOBERMINT "conservative" gets the 49 uproots.
Is it any wonder that you're all slaves of the Masonic cabal's goobermint? They knew human nature when they created the abomination, and you're still not awake yet if you support banhammers on private establishments.
"Governors need to ban private businesses from...." refusing to bake cakes to your gay wedding?
See how that goes? This is what happen when you refrain from thinking in principles and instead react with the way the pollster gaslights the answer before the question.
(The problem is that "private" businesses in question are Cabal corporations.)
Screw that. No business should be allowed to require me to damage my own health in order to be served. You're using a false equivalency.
I can refuse service to people if it forces me to directly violate my conscience. Here's the difference: I will bake anyone a cake, and can't refuse them service. However, if they ask me to put the names of two men on the cake, or a cake topper with two women, I am completely within my rights to say 'no.'
The nation can safely be guided by moral principles. There's no other way to govern. Anything else is tyranny, plain and simple.
I disagree. The reason why I am okay with desantis (or whoever) banning businesses from requiring vaccines is because the covid scam has been created by (more or less) government, and the majority of businesses that would require this are only requiring it because they are caving to the higher ups who are almost certainly being influenced by corruption and government power/money. Once government starts infecting business with bureaucracy and regulations and corporatism, it is not fair to call it "private" anymore. Just like airlines, big pharma, etc.
The same thing goes for the hippa excuse that I can't be made to tell someone whether I am vaccinated. In reality its actually just a bunch of liberal horseshit, but I don't mind abusing it given the situation.
"The reason why I am okay with desantis (or whoever) banning businesses from requiring vaccines is because the covid scam has been created by (more or less) government"
--Meaning the government created a problem and then used the problem to justify increasing its power.
Not even close. One is requiring someone to violate their religious beliefs in order to appease their whim. The other is requiring someone to treat customers equally whether or not they choose to follow a recommendation they believe will damage their health.
Let's put it another way: If I refuse to bake you a cake, you might have to put up with a wedding that's less than the standard in our society. If I refuse to sell you groceries, you might just starve to death.
Those two are not even close to equivalent, and anyone who argues they are is being disingenuous at best.
Being forced to bake two dudes or chicks sucking face on a cake is WAY different than forcing your customers to obtruct their breathing. BREATHING is a basic human right!!!! I can't believe this is a foriegn concept to people now.
It's not the same. In that case baking thing, the customers volunteered information about themselves and tried to force expression from another human the said person was uncomfortable with, thus violating said person's right to pursue happiness and liberty to choose who they engage in a contract with.
In the cases of vaccines, some businesses may try to require that a person have a permenant change to his body that cannot be undone in order to engage in a contractual relationship, thus interfering in their right to self determination and pursuit of happiness.
Governors need to ban private businesses from mandating masks or ‘asking’ (key word) for vaccination records.
AMEN!!! I'm so glad to hear the ISD will not be able to push this crap anymore, though!
"Governors need to ban private businesses from..." -- And the pro-BIGGOOBERMINT "conservative" gets the 49 uproots.
Is it any wonder that you're all slaves of the Masonic cabal's goobermint? They knew human nature when they created the abomination, and you're still not awake yet if you support banhammers on private establishments.
"Governors need to ban private businesses from...." refusing to bake cakes to your gay wedding?
See how that goes? This is what happen when you refrain from thinking in principles and instead react with the way the pollster gaslights the answer before the question.
(The problem is that "private" businesses in question are Cabal corporations.)
Screw that. No business should be allowed to require me to damage my own health in order to be served. You're using a false equivalency.
I can refuse service to people if it forces me to directly violate my conscience. Here's the difference: I will bake anyone a cake, and can't refuse them service. However, if they ask me to put the names of two men on the cake, or a cake topper with two women, I am completely within my rights to say 'no.'
The nation can safely be guided by moral principles. There's no other way to govern. Anything else is tyranny, plain and simple.
I disagree. The reason why I am okay with desantis (or whoever) banning businesses from requiring vaccines is because the covid scam has been created by (more or less) government, and the majority of businesses that would require this are only requiring it because they are caving to the higher ups who are almost certainly being influenced by corruption and government power/money. Once government starts infecting business with bureaucracy and regulations and corporatism, it is not fair to call it "private" anymore. Just like airlines, big pharma, etc. The same thing goes for the hippa excuse that I can't be made to tell someone whether I am vaccinated. In reality its actually just a bunch of liberal horseshit, but I don't mind abusing it given the situation.
"The reason why I am okay with desantis (or whoever) banning businesses from requiring vaccines is because the covid scam has been created by (more or less) government"
--Meaning the government created a problem and then used the problem to justify increasing its power.
*"No business should be allowed to (grab a grievance out of a hat) to (please a customer). You're using a false equivalency."
--They're precisely equivalent.
Not even close. One is requiring someone to violate their religious beliefs in order to appease their whim. The other is requiring someone to treat customers equally whether or not they choose to follow a recommendation they believe will damage their health.
Let's put it another way: If I refuse to bake you a cake, you might have to put up with a wedding that's less than the standard in our society. If I refuse to sell you groceries, you might just starve to death.
Those two are not even close to equivalent, and anyone who argues they are is being disingenuous at best.
Being forced to bake two dudes or chicks sucking face on a cake is WAY different than forcing your customers to obtruct their breathing. BREATHING is a basic human right!!!! I can't believe this is a foriegn concept to people now.
Nothing makes sense anymore. I feel like the guy at the end of "In the Mouth of Madness."
I'm glad my daughters won't have to cover their faces at school.
When words lose their meaning, people lose their freedom” --Confucius.
"...forcing your customers...."
If "force" is involved, then the person isn't a "customer".
It's not the same. In that case baking thing, the customers volunteered information about themselves and tried to force expression from another human the said person was uncomfortable with, thus violating said person's right to pursue happiness and liberty to choose who they engage in a contract with.
In the cases of vaccines, some businesses may try to require that a person have a permenant change to his body that cannot be undone in order to engage in a contractual relationship, thus interfering in their right to self determination and pursuit of happiness.