First, I will never get the vax, dangerous or not, it is experimental and the 99.8% survival rate of covid does not require a vax.
My point is, how can it be dangerous and allowef to roll out by the Q team?
And if it is not dangerous does it hurt our cause for us to try and convince others that it is dangerous? Should we simply quietly not get it and if asked explain low mortality rate of covid and experimental status of vax, but avoid alarmist comments about the vax being a depopulation tool.
Lastly, if the vax is indeed dangerous, did Q lose? And if that is the case what is plan B.
It's like I'm dealing with children. Why do I have to explain these things to you?
All deaths after taking the vaccines are reported to VAERS. All deaths. Not ones linked to the vaccine, but all of them. So when millions and millions of people take a vaccine of course there are going to be people that die afterwards, because people fucking die all the time. There would be VAERS deaths reports if it was tracking a placebo, understand?
Even if you assume all VAERS deaths are caused by the vaccine, which is an absurd premise, but even if I give you that; it's statistically STILL less dangerous than covid, which is not what was claimed above. Also, the claimant above never showed up to back up his claim, because he was fucking lying.
Did you read this paragraph too? Keep cursing, you’re losing credibility tough guy. How about you talk to me like a grown man/woman.
“The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA's multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as "safety signals." If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.”
You do know VAERS says In the same statement that although you can’t attribute every event as correct, it is valuable information to understanding a vaccine in its early stages? Did you keep reading?
Also go ahead and read Nuremberg code. Even ONE death and keeping this trial going is a violation of Nuremberg code
What's your fucking point?!?! Are you unable to comprehend english?! We're arguing over whether the vaccine is more deadly than covid. That's what the guy above said, and he was lying. You're now spouting off about the nuremburg code? Wtf are you doing? I'm not telling you to take the vaccine, just correcting someone who was spreading false information. Why are you continuously spouting useless and irrelevant information at me?
The vaccine is more deadly than COVID. COVID has a 99.7% survival rate. The CDC only reports 9,000 deaths attributed ENTIRELY dude to COVID.
COVID is a fraud