Has anyone with more brain matter than me, gone through the book of revelations as though they were Q drops? As though they were written by the same person or group?
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Guys regardless of what outcomes may be related to either, Q should not be a religion or related to religion. Honestly at best it is a bunch of government insiders trying to correct the system from the inside. All the religious and pseudo religious time traveling stuff is .... worrying and is going to disappoint. This is what the MSM focuses on to discredit anything related to Q.
Bull shit!
We know what happens in the end. God wins. Many times, Q has asked us to pray. He’s quoted the famous Biblical lines of Ephesians 6:12, “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” We’re living through monumental times. It’s comforting that Q believes that if we work together, God wins.
Men are morally weak and adrift without God / Jesus Christ / The Word.
Do not misunderstand me I am not saying that religion will disappoint I am saying mixing Q with religion will disappoint. One should not mix the secular and the holy.
You can't compartmentalize God from his creation. One springs from the other.
I understand all of this and there is a great deal of evidence to support this as well.
My question is are you really going to compare the Q posts on message boards to the Divinely inspired texts in the Holy Scriptures? Would you really put them in the same category?
Revelation 22:18&19
*18I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book. If anyone adds to them, God shall add to him the plagues that are written in this book; 19and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his share in the Tree of Life and the Holy City, which are written in this book. *
Would you really add to the words in the book?
That makes a lot more sense.
As well perhaps I misunderstood the OP as I understood the question "As though they were written by the same person or group?" to be meant literally.
Other things posted in this thread kind of leads me to believe that they do mean it literally. "The book of revelations is literally a book written by a time traveller in a religious text!"
I do not think Q and the author of Revelations are the same person. I would also not put the writings in the same category.
I also do not think Q is a time traveler nor the writer of revelation. They did not even write in the same language much less a mountain of evidence that would also cause problems for the theory.
You are correct I mean it literally, but it's also why I said by the same person or group.
Some of the descriptions in BoR read like someone watching the events unfolding in a war room. The way things are written, it reads like the author(John?) was physically there. If we take BoR at face value there is no other conclusion than the author was displaced through time. If he was just receiving a vision, then my theory rapidly falls apart.
We can't know if they're in the same category or not until tested. I'm not qualified or smart enough to make that test, but it looks like there have been some people smarter than I asking this question as well. Perhaps not exactly as I am, but close enough.
You do realize how many times Q has mentioned God, praying, the Bible, etc...
Q is all about God.
We have to stop worrying about what other people think. Freedom is being able to have abstract conversations and debates.
That I ask a question does not mean I believe that question. That would not be rational. First comes the question, then actually test the question and then process the results.
I’m more disappointed that people want to ignore religion, especially considering the United States and Canada are both founded on the belief in a higher power.
It doesn’t matter if you believe in God or not, the text may still be relevant. The book of revelations is literally a book written by a time traveller in a religious text! So if my theory is correct that BoR is talking about the present, then my question is a valid one to make within the context of the available tid bits of information.
I am not ignoring religion. I am religious. I was trying to state Q is not a religion and should not be considered part of it. Q can be a good thing and seems to be so far. Q has encouraged prayer and belief in God. All good things. Does not mean Q is an angel, apostle, disciple, or divine entity of any sort. At the end of the day Q has not said anything of religious importance any more than any person of piety. I am just saying we should not try to mix the secular and the holy.
The bible is a published book. BoR is a written account talking about a major event in human history. We are living through a major event in human history. To deny those connections is nieve. To deny the United States was founded on “In God we Trust” is unpatriotic.
So thus the question must be asked. Prove to me there isn’t a connection and I’ll accept it.
Mathew 24:36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.
i have thought that at times that "nothing can stop what is coming" and "the end wont be for everyone" could be rapture related. But I also not sure how that would work either.
Yeah, weird thought. Keep it to yourself.
What’s the point in having a discussion board? Q, GME, Maga and BoR all seem to have some connection points. I’m curious if anyone else has dug deeper into it because I haven’t.
I tend to view people that like to hide and censor curiosity with skepticism.
I have digged deeper, am digging as I write.
https://novusordowatch.org/2017/11/errors-of-michael-davies-refutation/#
500+ pages
If it was easy then everyone might do it.
Melissa RedPill the World addresses this very nicely
The Bible is very clear on the fact that no man, or angel, knows the time of the rapture, ONLY GOD knows!
That’s absolutely correct.
Eventually the people living through it will know as it will no longer be a prophecy. So then my question is still valid, because if my theory is correct, we’re living through it right now. If it’s not then connections made will be purely coincidental and the question will be answered.
no, but I've had the idea to do so. I think we're to apply many of Q's 'sayings' to how we read the Bible; future proves past, etc. etc.
AND the Sayings Gospel of Jesus is also known as the Q-Source...how many coincidences?? Q is definitely about God?
The truth? It’s the fruit of curiosity and my belief in God.
I don’t expect there to be a useful answer to the question. Some questions that can’t be answered are still worth asking and trying to solve.
Adrian Rogers did a book like this. I think it was Behold the Lamb. I learned a lot.