The Supreme Court already made it clear that if every individual, regardless of religion, is refused a religious practice, then it does not interfere with religious conviction. Reynolds vs The United States.
The silent 3rd peaceful group of the Civil War was told they could not practice their religious convictions because it was written that all Americans could not practice it.
So it follows that if all Texans are not allowed an abortion, regardless of their "belief" that it would follow the precedent has been set. Doesn't really matter if God had told those people to follow a specific practice or not, government has set precedent & should continue to follow it.
The Supreme Court already made it clear that if every individual, regardless of religion, is refused a religious practice, then it does not interfere with religious conviction. Reynolds vs The United States.
The silent 3rd peaceful group of the Civil War was told they could not practice their religious convictions because it was written that all Americans could not practice it.
So it follows that if all Texans are not allowed an abortion, regardless of their "belief" that it would follow the precedent has been set. Doesn't really matter if God had told those people to follow a specific practice or not, government has set precedent & should continue to follow it.