Its not true that they "never isolated SARS-CoV-2". Not by any reasonable definition. Is it true it has never been "isolated" in the sense of it being just the virus in a jar? Yes, but that is not how biology research works. No one in biology cares about that because its not necessary in experimental biology.
If one wanted to prove that any virus existed than such a complete isolation would be necessary. Once you establish the existence of viruses all that is necessary is things like getting electron microscopy pictures of it (of which there are thousands), or getting its effects on a cell culture (of which there are thousands), or getting its RNA sequence (which has been done thousands of times).
All of these techniques are extremely accurate. They are more than enough evidence for anyone who works in the field. Do they "prove" that the virus exists?
Yes and no.
Proof is a verb, not a noun. It is a decision that is up to each individual based on the available evidence. All of the things I listed above are very sound pieces of evidence that the virus exists. When done thousands of times, like has been done with SARS it becomes so much evidence that to deny it exists is ludicrous, even if it doesn't meet some specific standard that has never been shown to be necessary in the slightest, and for which there is substantial evidence that shows that it is not necessary.
I was basing part of my reply on the following information:
“I have a PhD in virology and immunology. I'm a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1500 "supposed" positive Covid 19 samples collected here in S. California. When my lab team and I did the testing through Koch's postulates and observation under a SEM (scanning electron microscope), we found NO Covid in any of the 1500 samples. What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some were influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S. PCR test. We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a few of the University of California labs and they found the same results as we did, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B. All of us then spoke to the CDC and asked for viable samples of COVID, which CDC said they could not provide as they did not have any samples.
We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious. The flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead were dead through co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema etc. and they then got the flu which further weakened their immune system and they died. I have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid 19 to work with. We at the 7 universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for Covid 19 fraud. the CDC has yet to send us a single viable, isolated and purifed sample of Covid 19. If they can't or won't send us a viable sample, I say there is no Covid 19, it is fictitious.
The four research papers that do describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19 virus never were successful in isolating and purifying the samples. All the four papers written on Covid 19 only describe small bits of RNA which were only 37 to 40 base pairs long which is NOT A VIRUS. A viral genome is typically 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs. With as bad as Covid is supposed to be all over the place, how come no one in any lab world wide has ever isolated and purified this virus in its entirety? That's because they've never really found the virus, all they've ever found was small pieces of RNA which were never identified as the virus anyway. So what we're dealing with is just another flu strain like every year, COVID 19 does not exist and is fictitious. I believe China and the globalists orchestrated this COVID hoax (the flu disguised as a novel virus) to bring in global tyranny and a worldwide police totalitarian surveillance state, and this plot included massive election fraud to overthrow Trump”
Since the time that I first saw this, I now see that apparently the "fact-checkers" are saying this is false. Given the amount of disinformation that is out there, I will now reserve judgment on this matter.
I have addressed this Dr. Knauss so many times, I am amazed you haven't seen it. There is no evidence this person exists. I looked for a long time trying to find corroborating evidence to support all of these assertions. I found none, and substantial good evidence to the contrary.
The four research papers that do describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19 virus
There are thousands, not "four".
never were successful in isolating and purifying the samples
By what metric? They all do things like take electron microscopy pictures. They all do cell cultures. They all RNA sequencing. They do so many things to show its existence. There is so much evidence its ridiculous. It takes time to find it. It helps to be a biologist. I have provided the evidence so many times it hurts.
In regards to this post of yours, I suggest you try to find Dr. Knauss yourself. Try to find any corroborating evidence yourself. If you find some let me know. Taking this guys word (a person who does not exist) as some meaningful law just because it fits your worst fears or ideals is not good investigation.
If the PCR test is bogus, then how can they say that ANYONE had COVID-19?
They've never isolated COVID, so how do we know COVID-19 even exists?
Its not true that they "never isolated SARS-CoV-2". Not by any reasonable definition. Is it true it has never been "isolated" in the sense of it being just the virus in a jar? Yes, but that is not how biology research works. No one in biology cares about that because its not necessary in experimental biology.
If one wanted to prove that any virus existed than such a complete isolation would be necessary. Once you establish the existence of viruses all that is necessary is things like getting electron microscopy pictures of it (of which there are thousands), or getting its effects on a cell culture (of which there are thousands), or getting its RNA sequence (which has been done thousands of times).
All of these techniques are extremely accurate. They are more than enough evidence for anyone who works in the field. Do they "prove" that the virus exists?
Yes and no.
Proof is a verb, not a noun. It is a decision that is up to each individual based on the available evidence. All of the things I listed above are very sound pieces of evidence that the virus exists. When done thousands of times, like has been done with SARS it becomes so much evidence that to deny it exists is ludicrous, even if it doesn't meet some specific standard that has never been shown to be necessary in the slightest, and for which there is substantial evidence that shows that it is not necessary.
I was basing part of my reply on the following information:
“I have a PhD in virology and immunology. I'm a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1500 "supposed" positive Covid 19 samples collected here in S. California. When my lab team and I did the testing through Koch's postulates and observation under a SEM (scanning electron microscope), we found NO Covid in any of the 1500 samples. What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some were influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S. PCR test. We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a few of the University of California labs and they found the same results as we did, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B. All of us then spoke to the CDC and asked for viable samples of COVID, which CDC said they could not provide as they did not have any samples.
We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious. The flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead were dead through co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema etc. and they then got the flu which further weakened their immune system and they died. I have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid 19 to work with. We at the 7 universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for Covid 19 fraud. the CDC has yet to send us a single viable, isolated and purifed sample of Covid 19. If they can't or won't send us a viable sample, I say there is no Covid 19, it is fictitious.
The four research papers that do describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19 virus never were successful in isolating and purifying the samples. All the four papers written on Covid 19 only describe small bits of RNA which were only 37 to 40 base pairs long which is NOT A VIRUS. A viral genome is typically 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs. With as bad as Covid is supposed to be all over the place, how come no one in any lab world wide has ever isolated and purified this virus in its entirety? That's because they've never really found the virus, all they've ever found was small pieces of RNA which were never identified as the virus anyway. So what we're dealing with is just another flu strain like every year, COVID 19 does not exist and is fictitious. I believe China and the globalists orchestrated this COVID hoax (the flu disguised as a novel virus) to bring in global tyranny and a worldwide police totalitarian surveillance state, and this plot included massive election fraud to overthrow Trump”
Since the time that I first saw this, I now see that apparently the "fact-checkers" are saying this is false. Given the amount of disinformation that is out there, I will now reserve judgment on this matter.
I have addressed this Dr. Knauss so many times, I am amazed you haven't seen it. There is no evidence this person exists. I looked for a long time trying to find corroborating evidence to support all of these assertions. I found none, and substantial good evidence to the contrary.
There are thousands, not "four".
By what metric? They all do things like take electron microscopy pictures. They all do cell cultures. They all RNA sequencing. They do so many things to show its existence. There is so much evidence its ridiculous. It takes time to find it. It helps to be a biologist. I have provided the evidence so many times it hurts.
In regards to this post of yours, I suggest you try to find Dr. Knauss yourself. Try to find any corroborating evidence yourself. If you find some let me know. Taking this guys word (a person who does not exist) as some meaningful law just because it fits your worst fears or ideals is not good investigation.