Is this your "special" version of being a grammar nazi?
I'm quite aware of the differences on this forum and the chans (specifically the various q boards).
What happened is literally the same as shitting the bread. Important topics of discussion were drowned out by useless posts that provided no sauce. People looking to the site to check it out will see the garbage/ crazy posts and leave. Same thing happened on chans, same thing happens here.
Maybe you should pay more attention by the way. There are a number of instances on this site where chan terminology persists. If the minor differences in how the chans work verses how this site works bothers you, perhaps you should call out every instance.
You special -- "Hey yuze guyz this isn't the same as the chans, so don't chan here."
Not to say I ever have a problem with your posts, but in this case you did not address a legitimate argument and instead relied on your "credentials" to do the speaking for you.
What was a dig or an insult? The word grammar nazi? Give me a break. It was an accurate description of what you were doing, or at least accurate enough. The original comment was a sound argument. You then came in and argued against the argument not by addressing the points of it, but by saying "you can't use the words that way, they don't apply".
That's pretty much the definition of a "grammer nazi".
You never addressed a single point of the poster, and from an outside perspective, I never saw a single thing that looks like an attack from them to you, but rather a presentation of an argument, which you ignored twice.
Is this your "special" version of being a grammar nazi?
I'm quite aware of the differences on this forum and the chans (specifically the various q boards).
What happened is literally the same as shitting the bread. Important topics of discussion were drowned out by useless posts that provided no sauce. People looking to the site to check it out will see the garbage/ crazy posts and leave. Same thing happened on chans, same thing happens here.
Maybe you should pay more attention by the way. There are a number of instances on this site where chan terminology persists. If the minor differences in how the chans work verses how this site works bothers you, perhaps you should call out every instance.
You special -- "Hey yuze guyz this isn't the same as the chans, so don't chan here."
Credentials do not an argument make.
Not to say I ever have a problem with your posts, but in this case you did not address a legitimate argument and instead relied on your "credentials" to do the speaking for you.
What was a dig or an insult? The word grammar nazi? Give me a break. It was an accurate description of what you were doing, or at least accurate enough. The original comment was a sound argument. You then came in and argued against the argument not by addressing the points of it, but by saying "you can't use the words that way, they don't apply".
That's pretty much the definition of a "grammer nazi".
You never addressed a single point of the poster, and from an outside perspective, I never saw a single thing that looks like an attack from them to you, but rather a presentation of an argument, which you ignored twice.