The article you linked is just a woke hit piece. Thought you had a counterpoint view; misrepresenting statements by a person is what establishment media does. we watched these stories unfold in real time and these so called “receipts” do not support your position.
What makes her so special? She flipped from being a hardcore lefty to a "conservative" overnight. She has yet to denounce her failed Social Autopsy project which is akin to the CCPs social credit score. There is nothing about her that makes her unique as far as conservatism is concerned -- yet people wet their pants when she says something edgy or throw out the inane "when is she going to run for office?" line, hells bells we can do much better.
Social Autopsy was unwise and naive, Candace was a bit arrogant, and the venture was rightly shot down. But it’s a far cry from the CCP social credit score — a technocratic control grid far more dangerous, you don’t know what and how they’re tracking.
Candace is pretty true to her same mission today, wiser in her approach. As for her “flipping” ... most among the “awakened” can identify a precise moment when the veil came down.
Personally, I love her commentary, but hope she does not run. Sad to see the awakened fall prey to celebrity. What makers her a great commentator would make her a terrible candidate.
Trump can get aways with because he’s never been a “commentator.”
The article you linked is just a woke hit piece. Thought you had a counterpoint view; misrepresenting statements by a person is what establishment media does. we watched these stories unfold in real time and these so called “receipts” do not support your position.
What makes her so special? She flipped from being a hardcore lefty to a "conservative" overnight. She has yet to denounce her failed Social Autopsy project which is akin to the CCPs social credit score. There is nothing about her that makes her unique as far as conservatism is concerned -- yet people wet their pants when she says something edgy or throw out the inane "when is she going to run for office?" line, hells bells we can do much better.
Social Autopsy was unwise and naive, Candace was a bit arrogant, and the venture was rightly shot down. But it’s a far cry from the CCP social credit score — a technocratic control grid far more dangerous, you don’t know what and how they’re tracking.
Candace is pretty true to her same mission today, wiser in her approach. As for her “flipping” ... most among the “awakened” can identify a precise moment when the veil came down.
Personally, I love her commentary, but hope she does not run. Sad to see the awakened fall prey to celebrity. What makers her a great commentator would make her a terrible candidate.
Trump can get aways with because he’s never been a “commentator.”