Watched carefully. He was holding it, but didn't squeeze it, just let it go. The ball was not that taut to get squeezed accidentally. With a softer ball like that, if you do squeeze, it would absorb the squeeze a bit more before bouncing off harder.
No gravity means the object isnt pulled toward de center of a certain mass. Now there is always gravity, just very weak. That said the small push down he gives the ball will inevitably push it down.
Weak gravity will not be enough to make the ball "fall" the way it did. At the most it would have slowly drifted over many minutes or hours. So lets take that out of this discussion.
As for the push - yes you can believe he happened to push it down, it is a subjective thing just by looking at the video, and I respect your perspective that it looked like a push. For reasons I outlined before, my perspective is different, and you haven't provided any new information to sway this view.
Not saying the weak gravity pulled the ball, was just pointing out we are always subjected to a gravity however small it may be. In there the strongest gravity pull could be upward for all we know, but it would still be too weak to counter a small push. I am saying its basically close to 0 gravity in there. A small push will send the ball in a direction and nothing will be there to slow it down. i am gonna check the video again later and try to see other moving things like hair and such.
check out the hair of the woman, the way they move and also the left person, using his core to bend (they are probably strapped/anchors by their foot to stay still). only other things really moving in that video and the small pad just laying against the legs of one of the person.
Water cannot fly. Meanwhile, 747s take off from airports all the time. Plenty of air routes go over arctic areas (been there, done that). Going directly over the north pole leads to Russia, which has very picky restrictions about air travel. It also is not good for the magnetic compass and the gyrocompass to go over a magnetic and rotational pole. Same thing for the south pole, with the added problem of being very far from an alternative landing point. I have never heard that "no one" has flown over either pole. No particular point in doing so. (More impressive for submarines to surface at the north pole.) Many air routes deviate from Great Circles owing to avoidance of political regions. And there are few air routes where there is little market. Not a lot of people have a need to travel directly from Botswana to Paraguay. As for the Mars Rover, ask NASA. They do everything they can to convince the world they are still a class act.
Watched carefully. He was holding it, but didn't squeeze it, just let it go. The ball was not that taut to get squeezed accidentally. With a softer ball like that, if you do squeeze, it would absorb the squeeze a bit more before bouncing off harder.
No gravity means the object isnt pulled toward de center of a certain mass. Now there is always gravity, just very weak. That said the small push down he gives the ball will inevitably push it down.
You are mixing two things together.
The weak gravity, and the push.
Weak gravity will not be enough to make the ball "fall" the way it did. At the most it would have slowly drifted over many minutes or hours. So lets take that out of this discussion.
As for the push - yes you can believe he happened to push it down, it is a subjective thing just by looking at the video, and I respect your perspective that it looked like a push. For reasons I outlined before, my perspective is different, and you haven't provided any new information to sway this view.
Not saying the weak gravity pulled the ball, was just pointing out we are always subjected to a gravity however small it may be. In there the strongest gravity pull could be upward for all we know, but it would still be too weak to counter a small push. I am saying its basically close to 0 gravity in there. A small push will send the ball in a direction and nothing will be there to slow it down. i am gonna check the video again later and try to see other moving things like hair and such.
check out the hair of the woman, the way they move and also the left person, using his core to bend (they are probably strapped/anchors by their foot to stay still). only other things really moving in that video and the small pad just laying against the legs of one of the person.
Water cannot fly. Meanwhile, 747s take off from airports all the time. Plenty of air routes go over arctic areas (been there, done that). Going directly over the north pole leads to Russia, which has very picky restrictions about air travel. It also is not good for the magnetic compass and the gyrocompass to go over a magnetic and rotational pole. Same thing for the south pole, with the added problem of being very far from an alternative landing point. I have never heard that "no one" has flown over either pole. No particular point in doing so. (More impressive for submarines to surface at the north pole.) Many air routes deviate from Great Circles owing to avoidance of political regions. And there are few air routes where there is little market. Not a lot of people have a need to travel directly from Botswana to Paraguay. As for the Mars Rover, ask NASA. They do everything they can to convince the world they are still a class act.