I've wondered for some time about the math of the One Child Program. If families in the 1960s and beyond were only allowed to have one child (and news reports of the time said families were aborting girls), how did they grow to a population of 1 billion plus? Two people having one child only replaces one of them. Having boys only in one generation removes the girls necessary for having the next generation. How does that work?
The math is what they want you to focus on. One child policy was instated for organ harvesting. Also it creates an underclass of non existent children that have no records. Hmm....what could possibly be the reason for that?
I've wondered for some time about the math of the One Child Program. If families in the 1960s and beyond were only allowed to have one child (and news reports of the time said families were aborting girls), how did they grow to a population of 1 billion plus? Two people having one child only replaces one of them. Having boys only in one generation removes the girls necessary for having the next generation. How does that work?
Just like the united States. People in small towns and villages are still normal human beings.
The math is what they want you to focus on. One child policy was instated for organ harvesting. Also it creates an underclass of non existent children that have no records. Hmm....what could possibly be the reason for that?