The previous three posts have covered some considerations for where we are today. The Federal Government has failed and become corrupt at all levels and Trump intentionally went about establishing the States as superior to the Federal Government during the Covid "scandemic".
But a question was posed in the last post that will lead into this one: What do we do when ALL branches of our government have turned against the very people they serve?
Are we really to believe the Feds are responsible for making sure the Feds play by the rules? Think about that for a moment. The Federal Government has convinced many Americans they are responsible for making sure they behave and don't violate law. But we've seen how that has turned out. In fact, this has become the primary source of frustration for most Americans that has resulted in our two-tier justice system.
Most of us understand that the Founding Fathers gave us the Second Amendment for this purpose. But that was meant to be the very last resort. Sure, it is still an option available to Americans but I believe it will not come to that.
Let's start with these important questions:
- Where does the Federal Government derive it's powers from?
- What permits the Federal Government to hold it's power?
Let's address the first question. Which brings us to an important part of this post - the Constitutional Compact. Today, this is referred to as Compact Theory - because just like conspiracy theory, the powers that be want to divert from the real truth.
Within the first twenty years of our nation, this had already reached the level of the Supreme Court. The Constitution was said to be a compact (i.e., contract) between the Federal Government and the States. However, the Supreme Court ruled and upheld on a few other occasions, that this was a contract between the citizens of the US and the Federal Government because of the phrase "We The People". They opined that because the states were representatives of the people, then it was the people that gave those powers to the Feds. In 1798, this became the first stone in the Feds seizing control.
Thomas Jefferson, one of the men who helped form and ratify the Constitution, infamously opposed this ruling as he was well aware of the intent of the Constitution. One has only look to the Tenth Amendment to see it conflicts with the Supreme Court ruling. In addition, many involved in the process (38 state representative delegates) noted the US Constitution was an improved version of the Articles of Confederation - which to that point treated the states as separate, sovereign nations.
It was not the People who ratified the US Constitution by vote, it was the States. The States wrote and drafted the US Constitution so all citizens would have the same basic rights and freedoms. Note that the Constitution does not say the powers not given to the Feds are given to the People. The tenth Amendment says the powers not given to the Feds are the sole authority of the States.
What would happen if you or I entered into a contract with someone and they didn't uphold their contractual duty. Would you be expected to uphold yours? We know the answer is no. What if they didn't and still decided to take you to court to uphold yours? You would expect the court to find the contract null and void. But what if the court happened to be in the employ of the party that violated the contract?
Isn't that what we have with the Federal Government today. Just since the beginning of 2020, we could all list dozens of Constitutional Violations and far-overstepping their delegated powers. They do this only because the courts are in their corner and they are free to violate their side of the contract while telling others they are held to it. This is how insane it has become.
But that leads us to the second question - What permits the Federal Government to hold it's power?
The very simple answer to this question is the States. Yes, we all feel like the government has all the power and that is why they can do what they want. But do they?
The Government of course will point to the anti-secession pact that Lincoln forced on the States after the war. All states except Texas are bound by this clause. However, to the earlier point, what happens when one party has continually violated their contract? Why are the States being told they are bound when the Feds feel they are not?
What happens when the States wake up and realize they actually hold all the power and the Federal Government has none? What happens when they realize what that truly means?
Why this all is important is you may have noticed after the Supreme Court refused to hear the Texas case regarding the election, the States began to take control again. For too long, they lazily seceded authority to the Federal Government that it did not have. You see, not only did Trump instill Patriotism and hope for our country back into many of it's citizens - he also began teaching the states that they, not the Feds, are the superior government in our nation.
It may be a coincidence, but do you find it unusual that Trump now lives in Florida and the Governor most standing up to the Federal tyranny today is Gov. DeSantis of Florida?
States are now passing laws that directly forbid certain Federal Laws from being upheld in their states. You are hearing about Second Amendment sanctuaries. You are seeing them passing laws forbidding abortion - because this was NEVER a power given to the Federal Government.
In Part V, we'll discuss the end game and why understanding all this was so important for it to happen. Our Founding Fathers were smart men who realized what it could do to a nation should it's government became so corrupt, and against the basic rights provided by our Creator, that it had to be cast off.
And they structured the US for just this moment that will be coming.
I will leave you with one final thought before posting Part V tomorrow. Going back to the excerpt posted in part one from the Declaration of Independence - Do Americans even believe they NEED a Federal Government anymore? What would America look like if the Federal Government didn't even exist and instead there existed a compact between the States? Most Importantly, how would you go about dissolving the ENTIRE Federal Government?
Previous posts in the series for reference:
Part I: https://greatawakening.win/p/12ih0IsGiS/the-end-is-coming--part-i-the-pi/
Part II: https://greatawakening.win/p/12ih0NQ8JN/the-end-is-coming--part-ii-a-sto/
Part III: https://greatawakening.win/p/12ih0Rwc89/the-end-is-coming--part-iii-stor/
From the beginning (in my first post) I have said this is one way it could play out. I was never told this is definitely the plan but I said it was a plausible explanation. However, what I was told is, if it goes down militarily, it is not going to go the way most in the Q community have thought. We have been so focused on justice being served we have forgotten this is not what the military is used for and, most likely, will not be how they are used should it come to that.
The main point leading to tomorrow and emphasized in your response. The Q community has long discussed tribunals and arrests because, as my post points out, the Feds are NOT going to arrest themselves (I suggested the exact opposite of what you said). That was the whole point at the beginning. What I was pointing out is the military is NOT going to be engaged for arrests.
Be aware, once exposed and targeted, the cabal is not just going to sit back and let them all be rounded up for trials. They are going to fight with their dying breath to keep it from happening. This is NOT going to be a law enforcement exercise, it will be an outright war.
Q did tell us what needed to happen for 11.3 to be triggered and the military to get involved. What I was told fell exactly into line with this.
But here is where people need to start thinking differently. How would the US Military react if a foreign power had invaded our soil? Would they be arresting them? Would they be trying to keep many of them from harm to save them for trial?
Q has said the end is not going to be for everybody for good reason. This is not going to be a simple clean up operation conducted by the US military. We need to be prepared for that.
As for the DOJ, have we not lived through Sessions, Huber, Barr and now Durham? Have you considered that Q has been pointing them out so you pay attention to the abject failure of the law enforcement that is supposed to be arresting and locking up these traitors? Do you really think it takes FIVE solid years of investigations before you have enough to round these people up? We heard Huber, Huber, Huber, in the beginning only to have Huber show up one day and say, "I got nothing." We heard Trust Sessions, only to have Sessions forced out at the end of mid-terms and President Trump go against him when he ran for Senate again. We heard Barr is coming, only for Barr to do nothing, ignore the blatant violations of the 14th Amendment during the pandemic and even go so far as to say they had seen no evidence of voter fraud - despite the overwhelming number of sworn affidavits that were happening nationwide. So I ask you, after witnessing all that, what would lead anyone to believe Durham is suddenly going to come to the rescue?
This is why the earlier posts. Consider that Q pointing out the DOJ constantly may have been for two other purposes than most believe. It may have been to draw our attention to the complete failure and corruption of our law enforcement and judicial branches. Secondly, and more importantly, it may have also been used to keep the traitors scared that justice was coming so they would get desperate and expose themselves and go so far as to commit the biggest crime in history in the last election - which they did in spades.
If the military is being activated to hand out 187's to the cabal and destroy the cabal permanently, I'm all for that, but are they really just going to randomly mow down elderly politicians and other people unprovoked? Some of the deep state would put up a fight, but I don't see someone as old and frail as George Soros to go reaching for a gun. So if they're not going to put up a fight, surely they're not just going to be randomly executed on sight. And you're still not addressing the arrests, because Q has mentioned numerous times that there WILL be arrests, even people in the media will be arrested and many would be tried for treason and crimes against humanity. So that still contradicts your statement that there won't be trials. If people will be arrested and tried, I also 100% doubt they would be done through civilian trials as we can all very clearly see how corrupt the civilian courts are. What I glean from a statement like "the military is the only way" is that the military (and military tribunals) are the only way to bring forth true justice and save our country. What you're suggesting is... um, I'm still not entirely sure what you're suggesting. And why are you saying "if" and "should" the military be used? I thought the military stepping in was a guarantee. As no one else will.
No, they are not going to mow them down.
However, you may want to consider what lengths they will go through to NOT be arrested.
I have considered, in fact I'm sure many of them will likely commit a [not]Epstein. But if the military aren't going to execute them on sight, and they aren't going to arrest them either, then what exactly are they going to do? Stand around and twiddle their thumbs? And who will conduct arrests? Respectfully, there's no need to be vague or cryptic about it, especially with how long you've built up to the final post.
The only logical scenario I see is the military declaring martial law (as for what would finally activate them, I have no idea, but we will find out at some point I suppose) and rounding up all the traitors and giving them a swift trial. The ones they manage to capture, anyway. The rest will either "save the taxpayer money" or play stupid games, if you know what I mean.
Q even said as much, spelling out in a few posts that this is precisely what the National Guard and Marines will be activated to do, and if the DS intends any harm on the military they will be met with swift fury. So to suggest that all of us are misreading this and we don't know the real outcome but you do, is a bit of a stretch.
Doesn't a stolen election and foreign interference constitute military activation?