While it isn't "free energy", there are a few possible places of untapped abundant energy. Below are a couple that I have studied to some extent.
Cold Fusion. This has been a suppressed technology. When it first came out it was "debunked" by repeating the experiment by not following the recommendations of the first experimenters (Fleishman and Pons). Since then there are three decades of overwhelming evidence including numerous working prototypes that support it. Until recently I thought this experimental failure and suppression by the physics muckity-mucks was due to hubris and dogma. Now I think it was probably suppressed by the PTB. With such an abundant energy source all their plans fall apart.
Zero point field energy extraction. Calculations of the energy density of empty space are non-zero. Different theories give (drastically) different amounts of energy per volume, but all theories are non-zero. Just because we haven't figured out how to do it (unless its also suppressed) doesn't mean it can't be done. All of our physics theories are known to be incorrect, incompatible and/or incomplete.
I know you will probably go on about how the aether is debunked because of special relativity bla bla but it actually hasn't . Just need to recognize competing theories of physics to see why.
QM does not make ZPE energy extraction impossible. QM is not even a complete theory. To suggest that something is impossible because a known incomplete theory says its impossible is exactly the same type of mindset that kept us subject to Luciferian rule for millennia.
If you don't look, you can't find.
We are told not to look at ZPE, despite the fact that every calculation from every theory suggests the ZPF contains a non-zero energy density. Research in that area is purposefully suppressed, both by funding and dogma. Who knows what the truth is?
It's dictated, because it's the most immediately intuitive way of thinking.
Yes and no. Its also the fact that no exception to that "rule" has ever been found (outside of the apparent expansion of the universe itself). But I agree that in general even having the desire to look is verboten. But that doesn't necessarily limit exploration as strictly as you might think.
What happens often is that people find something; it apparently violates CoE and then they look into it and find something new and fundamental. For example, "hot rocks" (radioactive uranium e.g.) violated CoE. But then when you look, you discover fission and E=MC^2, and a whole new world of exploration opens up in the attempt to resolve CoE.
This is why its adhered to. It always proves itself correct in the most exciting ways whenever you look into an apparent violation in your investigation.
In the example of the expansion of the universe, finding that CoE holds there would almost certainly be the most amazing discovery of all time because of what such a discovery would reveal.
Nevertheless, I agree wholeheartedly that keeping an open mind about it is essential. I think you would be surprised how many physicists do though, at least from my experience. It is the vocal shills that are close minded about such things. Many physicists retain the open minded explorative nature of a child.
This one in particular is not relating to free energy.
BTW - Magnetism IS a force, and the attraction force is slightly stronger than the repulsive force. (Equations show equality, but experiments can demonstrate otherwise)
Of course there is. That's why the patents were black shelved for decades.
Stan Meyer invented a car running on water. His invention was shelved and he died very mysteriously. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsMOFHPjZpo
Have a look at Tom Beardens site.
http://cheniere.org/references/index.html#Top
No but there is an absolute abundance of it.
E=mc^2 Energy is the most abundant thing in the universe. There isn't much else in fact.
yes we do.
While it isn't "free energy", there are a few possible places of untapped abundant energy. Below are a couple that I have studied to some extent.
Tesla described it as the aether.
Some info: https://tesla3.com/
I know you will probably go on about how the aether is debunked because of special relativity bla bla but it actually hasn't . Just need to recognize competing theories of physics to see why.
QM does not make ZPE energy extraction impossible. QM is not even a complete theory. To suggest that something is impossible because a known incomplete theory says its impossible is exactly the same type of mindset that kept us subject to Luciferian rule for millennia.
If you don't look, you can't find.
We are told not to look at ZPE, despite the fact that every calculation from every theory suggests the ZPF contains a non-zero energy density. Research in that area is purposefully suppressed, both by funding and dogma. Who knows what the truth is?
I always had an issue with the energy conservation narrative. It's dictated, because it's the most immediately intuitive way of thinking.
But I've never seen any developments researching the potential existence of systems that defy the conservation of energy.
How are you going to understand the whole by only studying predefined parts? You won't.
Science needs to return to its roots as the quest to unravel the mind of the lawgiver, God.
Yes and no. Its also the fact that no exception to that "rule" has ever been found (outside of the apparent expansion of the universe itself). But I agree that in general even having the desire to look is verboten. But that doesn't necessarily limit exploration as strictly as you might think.
What happens often is that people find something; it apparently violates CoE and then they look into it and find something new and fundamental. For example, "hot rocks" (radioactive uranium e.g.) violated CoE. But then when you look, you discover fission and E=MC^2, and a whole new world of exploration opens up in the attempt to resolve CoE.
This is why its adhered to. It always proves itself correct in the most exciting ways whenever you look into an apparent violation in your investigation.
In the example of the expansion of the universe, finding that CoE holds there would almost certainly be the most amazing discovery of all time because of what such a discovery would reveal.
Nevertheless, I agree wholeheartedly that keeping an open mind about it is essential. I think you would be surprised how many physicists do though, at least from my experience. It is the vocal shills that are close minded about such things. Many physicists retain the open minded explorative nature of a child.
Reeeeeeee reeeeeeee
Yeah i figured you'd say the same.
Nice assumption.... so happy you are able to determine the limits of my intelligence based on a few comments.
I'm smart enough to know it doesn't matter what info you are presented that you won't even consider it, so, what are we doing here?
Is this how you get your sick kicks?
Currently unharnessed...
Wind, water, solar, resonance?
The Earth is a capacitor.
Are we certain? What would be their incentive to provide us free power if they had that ability?
This one in particular is not relating to free energy.
BTW - Magnetism IS a force, and the attraction force is slightly stronger than the repulsive force. (Equations show equality, but experiments can demonstrate otherwise)
Of course there is. That's why the patents were black shelved for decades.
Stan Meyer invented a car running on water. His invention was shelved and he died very mysteriously. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsMOFHPjZpo
https://mathscholar.org/2019/03/lenr-energy-science-or-pseudoscience/?fbclid=IwAR0Do8SHMVGrU8EdNdo5bl1BM7uLGlO3wtUQCVa6RJn634IAyLpfDMgAJjo
All matter is energy just waiting to be converted.
Why isn't everyone archiving their pages more like.
WE DO NOT WANT TO GIVE 'NEWS' MEDIA CLICKS!!!