Do you have your [ ] filled in?
(media.greatawakening.win)
![Do you have your [ ] filled in?](https://media.greatawakening.win/post/hdWip5bd.jpeg){kind=link}
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
if it doesn’t link to the email in question, it’s not helpful other than circle jerking with people who already believe it
send a 3200-page doc to a person and say, “trust me it’s in there, look it up yourself” is super gay
So, to be clear, giving you the specific page link to the email in question isn’t helpful and then sending you the entire 3000+ email dump and then also giving you the specific page number that’s clearly in the pic of the email in question and telling you to scroll to the page number in question isn’t helpful either? Am I understanding that correctly? ?
that was helpful - I am not complaining about that. What I am doing is trying to help you understand why I initially thought it was bogus, because OP originally provided as proof a link to the entire document dump with no info on page number, seemed like a classic forum-infiltration resource-depletion shill troll. Not sure if you’re going to understand it - i am surprised you don’t get it already - but I’m trying.
What I’m saying is that what I’ve supplied you with, the links, is it. That is it. What you’re wanting I’m gathering is something that I have no way of attaining, I don’t believe, without some credentials such as a journalist or lawyer could obtain. Now, this document cloud was compiled by the Leopold guy, I understand your hesitancy, I really do. However, I believe it’s been discovered that the initial FOIA request was done by Tom Fitton/Judicial Watch. The only other avenue I can think of to get the source source is through a FOIA request. I’m sorry that I can’t do anything more than give you the links I have, but that’s all I’ve got. I did go back and saw the specific page link for page 1408, did not have the page number with the specific document, I can understand your hesitancy on that and I apologize for that.
that’s all i was looking for originally and I now have it, so i am not sure why we are still talking about my original comment