Was cyberspace their role the whole time? Were we generally misled while they battled their first “deployment” in cyberspace?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Who said cyberspace was their roll?
This post was posed as a question for discussion, you may have missed the point. No one has said it to my knowledge.
Ok let me rephrase:
Why do you think Space Force is secret code for Cyber Space Force?
If we need a Cyber Force why wouldn't we just create it and call it U.S. Cyber Force?
I've wondered if this was the case as well if that's a part of space force.
Why not calling it what it actually is should be obvious to how deep the swamp runs. Trump knew they were going to cheat like never before.
Also what has been recurring to me was the statement from him while still in office to the public of how "some" have said exposing election fraud might be his best accomplishment.
Duke Nukem:
Do you realize you are responsible for my career choices? I tried to hack your game, that google search ended 20 years later and I ended up being a "programmer" because of it.
What are you? Some bottom-feeding, scum-sucking algae eater?
Well, I wouldn’t say it’s name would literally be Cyberspace Force but, more so it’s role. It could be call Space Force and play it’s part in literal inner Space, satellites, cyber-space, etc.
Why not call it what it is? It was a newly formed branch designed for an initial purpose to secure/protect our nation in the next battlefield, perhaps the election. Do you announce to your enemies you have a plane coming in to drop a bomb or do you build a stealth and distract them? Space Force, by name could have been stealth. After it’s first mission, you know it’s there.
What about this agency ?
https://www.nsa.gov/what-we-do/cybersecurity/
They may or may not be doing it well. But it is definitely in their wheelhouse.
The Air Force already was doing some of these things. I know a guy who works in cyber security for them.
Can't 'Space' be interpreted in more than one sense?
Rereading the quote you posted with that in mind I can see the openness to interpretation.