Not really. It's cases that correlate with the vaccine. And with the very low reporting rate, one might expect that those reporting feel very strongly about the correlation.
Hypotheses are formulated upon correlation. If true science existed then this hypothesis would be subjected to the scientific process.
"Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS, whether or not they believe the vaccine was the cause."
Straight from VAERS. So no, they don't need to feel strongly, they are told to report it even if they don't.
With the level of follow up investigating that's being done for these deaths (which is effectively none by the CDC) you can't definitively say whether it was or was not due to the vaccine. But you shilling that it has to be one way all over this thread is telling which narrative you want it to be.
Not really. It's cases that correlate with the vaccine. And with the very low reporting rate, one might expect that those reporting feel very strongly about the correlation.
Hypotheses are formulated upon correlation. If true science existed then this hypothesis would be subjected to the scientific process.
"Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS, whether or not they believe the vaccine was the cause."
Straight from VAERS. So no, they don't need to feel strongly, they are told to report it even if they don't.
With the level of follow up investigating that's being done for these deaths (which is effectively none by the CDC) you can't definitively say whether it was or was not due to the vaccine. But you shilling that it has to be one way all over this thread is telling which narrative you want it to be.
Me telling you the same exact thing Trump is telling you is shilling.
K.